Pinpoint · Judgment search

Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions v Vina Money Transfer Pty Ltd

[2022] FCA 665 ; (2022) 294 FCR 449

Federal Court of Australia · 9 June 2022 · Official judgment

Cited by 5 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 1 Cited 4

2022: 3 citing judgments 2024: 2 citing judgments 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Rasel v R [2022] NSWCCA 239 Applied or followed NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 2× · judgment
  2. Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions v Joyce [2022] FCA 1423 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  3. Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions v Alkaloids of Australia Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 1424 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  4. Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions v Bingo Industries Pty Ltd; Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions v Tartak [2024] FCA 121 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  5. Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions v Aussie Skips Bin Services Pty Ltd; Aussie Skips Recycling Pty Ltd; Roussakis [2024] FCA 122 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (47)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. R v Wirth (1976) 14 SASR 296 Cited
  2. R v De Simoni [1981] HCA 31 Cited cited 608×
  3. R v Smith (1987) 44 SASR 587 Cited cited 120×
  4. Postiglione v The Queen [1997] HCA 26 Cited cited 816×
  5. Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v J McPhee & Son (Australia) Pty Ltd (No. 5) [1998] FCA 310 Cited cited 9×
  6. R v Olbrich [1999] HCA 54 Cited cited 1,119×
  7. J McPhee & Son (Aust) Pty Ltd v ACCC [2000] FCA 365 Cited cited 96×
  8. REGINA v HANNES [2000] NSWCCA 503 Cited cited 36×
  9. Wong v The Queen [2001] HCA 64 Cited cited 1,044×
  10. COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION v BAFFSKY [2001] NSWCCA 332 Cited cited 19×
  11. R v Qutami [2001] NSWCCA 353 Cited cited 396×
  12. Weininger v The Queen [2003] HCA 14 Cited cited 242×
  13. Regina v Rivkin [2004] NSWCCA 7 Cited cited 119×
  14. R v Jones [2004] VSCA 68 Applied or followed cited 10×
  15. Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Leahy Petroleum Pty Ltd (No 3) [2005] FCA 265 Cited cited 107×
  16. Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25 Cited cited 2,508×
  17. Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Page [2006] VSCA 224 Cited cited 7×
  18. Cahyadi v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 1 Cited cited 601×
  19. R v Gajjar [2008] VSCA 268 Cited cited 26×
  20. Scook v R [2008] WASCA 114 Cited cited 21×
  21. Hili v The Queen [2010] HCA 45 Cited cited 1,194×
  22. R v Nguyen; R v Pham [2010] NSWCCA 238 Cited cited 135×
  23. Vaysman v Deckers Outdoor Corporation Inc. [2011] FCAFC 17 Cited cited 23×
  24. Green v The Queen [2011] HCA 49 Cited cited 741×
  25. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Apple Pty Limited [2012] FCA 646 Cited cited 36×
  26. Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2012] FCAFC 20 Cited cited 319×
  27. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 54 Cited cited 460×
  28. GIOURTALIS, Angelos v R [2013] NSWCCA 216 Cited cited 29×
  29. FB v R [2014] NSWCCA 282 Cited cited 3×
  30. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Visa Inc [2015] FCA 1020 Cited cited 15×
  31. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Limited [2015] FCA 330 Cited cited 164×
  32. Queen v Pham [2015] HCA 39 Cited cited 225×
  33. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited [2016] FCA 1516 Cited cited 29×
  34. R v Curtis (No 3) [2016] NSWSC 866 Cited cited 16×
  35. Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Thomas [2016] VSCA 237 Cited cited 25×
  36. Thunder Studios Inc (California) v Kazal (No 2) [2017] FCA 202 Cited cited 14×
  37. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Halkalia Pty Ltd (No 3) [2017] FCA 522 Cited cited 11×
  38. Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions v Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha [2017] FCA 876 Cited cited 10×
  39. Jinde Huang aka Wei Liu v R [2018] NSWCCA 70 Cited cited 53×
  40. Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd [2019] FCA 1170 Cited cited 9×
  41. Lusty v CRA20 [2020] FCA 1737 Cited cited 12×
  42. Bae v R [2020] NSWCCA 35 Cited cited 38×
  43. Khalid v R [2020] NSWCCA 73 Cited cited 17×
  44. Rogerson v The Queen [2020] VSCA 82 Applied or followed
  45. Matson v Attorney-General (Cth) [2021] FCA 161 Cited cited 16×
  46. Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions v Wallenius Wilhelmsen Ocean AS [2021] FCA 52 Cited cited 6×
  47. Totaan v R [2022] NSWCCA 75 Applied or followed cited 88×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.