Pinpoint · Judgment search

Gram Engineering Pty Ltd v Bluescope Steel Ltd

[2018] FCA 539

Federal Court of Australia · 20 April 2018 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Authorities cited (14)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v Puncture Proof Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd (1899) 16 RPC 209 Cited cited 3×
  2. Colbeam Palmer Ltd v Stock Affiliates Pty Ltd [1968] HCA 50 Cited cited 79×
  3. Enzed Holdings Ltd v Wynthea Pty Ltd [1984] FCA 373 Cited cited 14×
  4. Sellars v Adelaide Petroleum NL [1994] HCA 4 Cited cited 418×
  5. Golden Editions Pty Ltd t/as Hughes Leisure Group v Polygram Pty Ltd & Anor [1997] FCA 687 Cited cited 19×
  6. Placer (Granny Smith) Pty Ltd v Thiess Contractors Pty Ltd [2003] HCA 10 Cited cited 158×
  7. TS & B Retail Systems Pty Ltd v 3Fold Resources Pty Ltd (No 3) [2007] FCA 151 Cited cited 35×
  8. Norm Engineering v Digga Australia [2007] FCA 761 Cited cited 20×
  9. Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Limited (ACN 001 660 715) v D.A.P. Services (Kempsey) Pty Limited (in liquidation) (ACN 055 803 542) [2007] FCAFC 40 Cited cited 52×
  10. Elwood Clothing Pty Ltd (ACN 079 393 696) v Cotton On Clothing Pty Ltd (ACN 052 130 462) [2009] FCA 633 Cited cited 15×
  11. Flashback Holdings Pty Ltd v Showtime DVD Holdings Pty Ltd (No 6) [2010] FCA 694 Cited
  12. Gram Engineering Pty Ltd v Bluescope Steel Ltd [2013] FCA 508 Cited cited 5×
  13. BlueScope Steel Limited v Gram Engineering Pty Ltd [2014] FCAFC 107 Cited cited 3×
  14. Bayer Pharma Aktiengesellschaft v Generic Health Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 250 Cited cited 9×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.