Pinpoint · Judgment search

FER17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs

[2019] FCAFC 106

Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · 24 June 2019 · Official judgment

Cited by 5 indexed judgments

All Distinguished 3 Cited 2

2019: 1 citing judgment, 1 negative 2020: 3 citing judgments, 2 negative 2022: 1 citing judgment 2019 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. BZV18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 1406 Distinguished Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  2. BRC17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 217 Distinguished Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  3. AZK18 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 331 Distinguished Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  4. BJB17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 1683 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  5. Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v EGZ17 [2022] FCAFC 12 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 21× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (17)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. House v The King [1936] HCA 40 Cited cited 4,342×
  2. R v Burgess; Ex parte Henry [1936] HCA 52 Cited cited 32×
  3. Oppenheimer v Cattermole [1976] AC 249 Cited cited 12×
  4. Attorney-General (NSW) v Quin [1990] HCA 21 Cited cited 736×
  5. Sykes v Cleary [1992] HCA 60 Cited cited 27×
  6. Tji, Lay Kon v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs [1998] FCA 1380 Cited cited 9×
  7. Applicants in V 722 of 2000 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 1059 Cited cited 3×
  8. SFGB v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 77 ALR 402 Cited
  9. Fox v Percy [2003] HCA 22 Cited cited 1,476×
  10. VSAB v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCA 239 Cited cited 5×
  11. Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18 Cited cited 1,516×
  12. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Stretton [2016] FCAFC 11 Cited cited 478×
  13. SZTAL v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] HCA 34 Cited cited 583×
  14. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v AMA16 (2018) 254 FCR 534 Cited
  15. FER17 v Minister for Immigration [2018] FCCA 3767 Cited cited 3×
  16. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW [2018] HCA 30 Cited cited 620×
  17. Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 34 Cited cited 627×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.