Pinpoint · Judgment search

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Youi Pty Ltd

[2020] FCA 1701

Federal Court of Australia · 26 November 2020 · Official judgment

Cited by 4 indexed judgments

All Cited 4

2020: 1 citing judgment 2021: 1 citing judgment 2023: 1 citing judgment 2024: 1 citing judgment 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. In the matter of Bio Health Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 1790 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  2. Australian Securities and Investments Commission v TAL Life Limited (No 2) [2021] FCA 193 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 10× · judgment
  3. Australian Securities and Investments Commission v MLC Limited [2023] FCA 539 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  4. Carbone v Fowler Homes Pty Ltd; Carbone v Fowler Homes Pty Ltd [2024] NSWCA 192 Cited NSW Court of Appeal · cited 4× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (6)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Moss v Sun Alliance Australia Ltd (1990) 55 SASR 145 Cited cited 10×
  2. Kelly v New Zealand Insurance Co Ltd (1996) 130 FLR 97 Cited cited 11×
  3. Rural Press Limited v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2003] HCA 75 Cited cited 273×
  4. AMP Financial Planning Pty Ltd v CGU Insurance Ltd [2005] FCAFC 185 Cited cited 20×
  5. CGU Insurance Limited v AMP Financial Planning Pty Ltd [2007] HCA 36 Cited cited 52×
  6. Delor Vue Apartments CTS 39788 v Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd (No 2) [2020] FCA 588 Cited cited 12×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.