District Court of NSW · 17 March 2020 · Official judgment
No indexed judgment cites this case yet.
The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.
(1999) 18 NSWCCR 60 Cited cited 3×[2016] NSWDC 56 Cited cited 8×[1981] HCA 26 Cited cited 693×[1995] HCA 24 Cited cited 906×(1977) 180 CLR 266 Cited cited 542×[1982] HCA 24 Cited cited 1,322×[1984] HCA 64 Cited cited 606×[1990] HCA 33 Cited cited 2,077×[1997] HCA 2 Cited cited 792×[1981] HCA 26 Cited cited 693×[1985] HCA 48 Cited cited 194×[1989] HCA 8 Cited cited 124×(1991) 25 NSWLR 358 Cited cited 125×[1998] HCA 28 Cited cited 2,785×[1981] HCA 26 Cited cited 693×[1994] HCA 15 Cited cited 371×[1995] HCA 20 Cited cited 502×[1997] HCA 4 Cited cited 414×[2009] HCA 41 Cited cited 830×[1955] HCA 27 Cited cited 194×[1981] HCA 26 Cited cited 693×[1997] HCA 2 Cited cited 792×[1998] HCA 28 Cited cited 2,785×[2012] HCA 56 Cited cited 386×[2017] NSWCA 86 Cited cited 7×[1981] HCA 26 Cited cited 693×[1998] HCA 28 Applied or followed cited 2,785×[1981] HCA 26 Cited cited 693×[1994] HCA 15 Cited cited 371×[1995] HCA 20 Cited cited 502×[1997] HCA 4 Cited cited 414×[2008] NSWCA 67 Cited cited 149×[1995] HCA 24 Cited cited 906×[1997] HCA 2 Cited cited 792×[2003] HCA 2 Cited cited 1,335×[2007] HCA 22 Cited cited 819×[2009] HCA 41 Cited cited 830×[1955] HCA 27 Cited cited 194×[1981] HCA 26 Cited cited 693×[1997] HCA 2 Cited cited 792×[1998] HCA 28 Cited cited 2,785×[2011] HCA 10 Cited cited 153×[1936] HCA 40 Cited cited 4,342×[1998] HCA 28 Cited cited 2,785×[2003] HCA 2 Cited cited 1,335×[2010] HCA 45 Cited cited 1,194×[2012] HCA 56 Cited cited 386×[2018] HCA 55 Cited cited 81×Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.
(1999) 18 NSWCCR 60
Cited cited 3× [2016] NSWDC 56
Cited cited 8× [2017] NSWCA 86
Cited cited 7× [2018] HCA 55
Cited cited 81× Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.
Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.
Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.
Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.