Pinpoint · Judgment search

R v Sultan

[2021] NSWDC 776

District Court of NSW · 16 December 2021 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Authorities cited (26)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Lowe v The Queen [1984] HCA 46 Cited cited 738×
  2. R v Pangallo (1991) 56 ACrimR 441 Cited cited 2×
  3. R v Savvas (2) (1991) 58 A Crim R 174 Cited cited 13×
  4. R v Masters (1992) 26 NSWLR 450 Cited cited 65×
  5. R v Shore (1992) 66 A Crim R 37 Cited cited 33×
  6. Postiglione v R (1997) 189 CLR 294 Cited
  7. Postiglione v The Queen [1997] HCA 26 Cited cited 816×
  8. R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 348 Cited cited 2×
  9. REGINA v HENRY BARBER TRAN SILVER TSOUKATOS KYROGLOU JENKINS [1999] NSWCCA 111 Cited cited 1,285×
  10. REGINA v MURCHIE [1999] NSWCCA 424 Cited cited 34×
  11. R v THOMSON; R v HOULTON [2000] NSWCCA 309 Cited cited 2,216×
  12. REGINA v GIANG [2001] NSWCCA 276 Cited cited 19×
  13. R v Newell [2004] NSWCCA 183 Cited cited 67×
  14. Regina v Davis [2004] NSWCCA 310 Cited cited 7×
  15. R v VL [2005] NSWCCA 301 Cited cited 3×
  16. Richards v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 262 Cited cited 10×
  17. MARINELLIS v REGINA [2006] NSWCCA 307 Cited cited 29×
  18. Tyler v Regina; Regina v Chalmers [2007] NSWCCA 247 Cited cited 125×
  19. TAYLOR v. REGINA [2007] NSWCCA 99 Cited cited 14×
  20. Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194 Cited cited 1,099×
  21. REGINA v PFC [2011] NSWCCA 117 Cited cited 18×
  22. Dickson v R [2016] NSWCCA 105 Cited cited 32×
  23. Valentine v R [2020] NSWCCA 116 Cited cited 35×
  24. Hoskins v R [2021] NSWCCA 169 Cited cited 59×
  25. R v Jones [2021] NSWDC 478 Cited cited 2×
  26. R v Colvin (No 2) [2021] NSWDC 494 Cited cited 3×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.