Pinpoint · Judgment search

Budumu Pty Ltd (ACN 001 216 397)

[2021] NSWSC 522

Supreme Court of NSW · 12 May 2021 · Official judgment

Cited by 3 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 1 Cited 2

2021: 1 citing judgment 2022: 1 citing judgment 2023: 1 citing judgment 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. In the matter of the George Hardi Family Trust [2021] NSWSC 1584 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 3× · judgment
  2. TNB 878 Pty Limited – Brunskill Family Trust [2022] NSWSC 527 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  3. Lowther Park Pty Ltd as trustee for the Lowther Park Family Trust v Simon Della Marta [2023] NSWSC 1555 Applied or followed Supreme Court of NSW · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (4)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Re Dion Investments Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 367 Cited cited 37×
  2. Re Dion Investments Pty Limited [2020] NSWSC 1661 Cited cited 7×
  3. Cecil Investments Pty limited [2021] NSWSC 211 Cited cited 6×
  4. Casibond Pty Ltd: In the matter of George Tsivis Family Trust [2021] NSWSC 320 Cited cited 4×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.