Pinpoint · Judgment search

Pipeclay Lawson Ltd v Brand Ventures Pty Ltd

[2021] NSWSC 909

Supreme Court of NSW · 27 July 2021 · Official judgment

Cited by 1 indexed judgment

All Cited 1

2021: 1 citing judgment 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Bridson v Relf [2021] NSWCATCD 114 Cited NCAT Consumer and Commercial · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (17)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Twyman v Knowles (1853) 13 CB 222 Cited
  2. Twyman v Knowles (1853) 138 ER 1183 Cited
  3. Proudfoot v Hart (1890) 25 QBD 42 Cited cited 29×
  4. Lurcott v Wakely & Wheeler (1911) 1 KB 905 Cited cited 3×
  5. Lurcott v Wakely & Wheeler [1911] KB 905 Cited
  6. Anstruther-Gough-Calthorpe v McOscar (1924) 1 KB 716 Cited
  7. Anstruther-Gough-Calthorpe v McOscar [1924] 1 KB 716 Cited cited 6×
  8. Graham v Markets Hotel Pty Ltd [1943] HCA 8 Cited cited 10×
  9. Abrahams v Shaw (1969) 72 SR (NSW) 225 Applied or followed cited 2×
  10. Holding and Management Ltd v Property Holding and Investment Trust Plc [1990] 1 EGLR 65 Applied or followed cited 2×
  11. Hogan v Baseden (1997) 8 BPR 15 Cited cited 175×
  12. Lamru Pty Ltd v Kation Pty Ltd (1998) 44 NSWLR 432 Cited cited 40×
  13. Alcatel Australia Ltd v Scarcella [1998] NSWSC 483 Cited cited 127×
  14. Welsh v Greenwich London Borough Council [2000] 49 EG 118 Cited cited 2×
  15. Lee v Leeds City Council [2002] 1 WLR 1488 Cited cited 2×
  16. Bonafair Holdings Pty Ltd v Hungry Jack’s Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCA 276 Cited cited 2×
  17. Sydney Local Health District v Macquarie International Health Clinic Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCA 274 Cited cited 13×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.