Pinpoint · Judgment search

Storry v Weir

[2022] FCA 794

Federal Court of Australia · 7 July 2022 · Official judgment

Cited by 6 indexed judgments

All Cited 6

2022: 3 citing judgments 2024: 3 citing judgments 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Storry v Business Licensing Authority [2022] FCA 1321 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  2. Storry v Weir (No 2) [2022] FCA 1360 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 7× · judgment
  3. Storry v Weir [2022] FCA 1484 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 5× · judgment
  4. Storry v Parkyn [2024] FCAFC 67 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 3× · judgment
  5. Storry v Parkyn (Vexatious Proceedings Order) [2024] FCAFC 100 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 9× · judgment
  6. Storry v Clout [2024] FCA 1274 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (10)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Wanstall v Burke [1925] St R Qd 295 Cited
  2. Sandell v Porter [1966] HCA 28 Cited cited 193×
  3. Wren v Mahony [1972] HCA 5 Applied or followed cited 223×
  4. Tu v Chang (No 2) [2016] FCA 1568 Cited cited 4×
  5. Ramsay Health Care Australia Pty Ltd v Compton [2017] HCA 28 Applied or followed cited 95×
  6. Storry v Commissioner of Police [2017] QDC 282 Cited cited 4×
  7. Storry v Commissioner of Police [2018] QCA 291 Cited cited 4×
  8. Doggett v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2019] FCAFC 19 Cited cited 25×
  9. Storry v Weir [2022] FCA 362 Cited cited 6×
  10. Weir v Storry [2022] FedCFamC2G 183 Cited cited 7×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.