Pinpoint · Judgment search

Firth v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd

[2022] NSWCATAD 156

NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · 18 May 2022 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Authorities cited (22)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. O'Callaghan v Loder [1983] 3 NSWLR 89 Cited cited 59×
  2. Australian Iron & Steel Pty Ltd v Banovic [1989] HCA 56 Cited cited 152×
  3. Waters v Public Transport Corporation [1991] HCA 49 Cited cited 337×
  4. Commissioner of Corrective Services -v- Aldridge (EOD) [2000] NSWADTAP 5 Cited cited 152×
  5. Sivananthan -v- Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service [2001] NSWADT 44 Cited cited 98×
  6. Dutt -v- Central Coast Area Health Service [2002] NSWADT 133 Cited cited 212×
  7. Purvis v New South Wales (Department of Education and Training) [2003] HCA 62 Cited cited 351×
  8. Walker v State of New South Wales [2003] NSWADT 13 Cited cited 17×
  9. Reddy v. International Cargo Express [2004] NSWADT 218 Cited cited 11×
  10. Mitchell v Clayton Utz & Ors [2009] NSWADT 266 Cited cited 7×
  11. Nicholls and Nicholls v Director General, Department of Education and Training (No 2) [2009] NSWADTAP 20 Cited cited 119×
  12. Georgiou v Spencer Holdings Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 22 Cited cited 4×
  13. State of NSW (NSW Police Force) v Whitfield (EOD) [2012] NSWADTAP 27 Cited cited 14×
  14. Purvis v New South Wales (Department of Education and Training) [2013] HCA 62 Cited
  15. Watts v Australian Postal Corporation [2014] FCA 370 Cited cited 37×
  16. Wright v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2014] NSWCATAD 16 Cited cited 12×
  17. Burns v Sunol [2014] NSWCATAD 2 Cited cited 10×
  18. Burns v Sunol [2014] NSWCATAD 62 Cited cited 9×
  19. Lipman v Commissioner of Police [2015] NSWCATAD 250 Cited cited 4×
  20. Stefanac v Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services [2018] NSWCATAD 106 Cited cited 3×
  21. Araya v Owners Corporation SP65717 [2021] NSWCATAD 5 Cited
  22. Mercieca v IHG Hotels Management Group (Australia) Pty Ltd & Salter Brothers (Coogee Beach) Pty Ltd [2022] NSWCATAD 63 Cited
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.