Pinpoint · Judgment search

R v Brown (a pseudonym)

[2024] NSWDC 618

District Court of NSW · 17 December 2024 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Authorities cited (38)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. R v Herring (1956) 73 WN (NSW) 203 Cited cited 64×
  2. R v Holder [1983] 3 NSWLR 245 Cited cited 196×
  3. R v Smith (1987) 44 SASR 587 Cited cited 120×
  4. Mill v The Queen [1988] HCA 70 Cited cited 841×
  5. R v Sellen (1991) 57 A Crim R 313 Cited cited 23×
  6. R v Clinch (1994) 72 A Crim R 301 Cited cited 62×
  7. Postiglione v The Queen [1997] HCA 26 Cited cited 816×
  8. Gray v Motor Accident Commission [1998] HCA 70 Cited cited 253×
  9. REGINA v WAYNE RONALD BURRELL [2000] NSWCCA 262 Cited cited 27×
  10. R v THOMSON; R v HOULTON [2000] NSWCCA 309 Cited cited 2,216×
  11. Regina v Wheeler [2000] NSWCCA 34 Cited cited 100×
  12. REGINA v SIMPSON [2001] NSWCCA 534 Cited cited 682×
  13. ATTORNEY GENERAL'S APPLICATION UNDER s37 OF THE CRIMES (SENTENCING PROCEDURE) ACT 1999 NO 1 OF 2002 [2002] NSWCCA 518 Cited cited 871×
  14. Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25 Cited cited 2,508×
  15. R v M.A.K., R v M.S.K. [2006] NSWCCA 381 Cited cited 369×
  16. Cahyadi v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 1 Cited cited 601×
  17. R v HARRIS [2007] NSWCCA 130 Cited cited 97×
  18. REGINA v XX [2009] NSWCCA 115 Cited cited 143×
  19. Hili v The Queen [2010] HCA 45 Cited cited 1,194×
  20. Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194 Cited cited 1,099×
  21. Kuti v R [2012] NSWCCA 43 Cited cited 11×
  22. Munda v Western Australia [2013] HCA 38 Cited cited 287×
  23. Abbas, Bodiotis, Taleb and Amoun v R [2013] NSWCCA 115 Cited cited 164×
  24. Barbaro v The Queen [2014] HCA 2 Cited cited 358×
  25. R v O'Connor [2014] NSWCCA 53 Cited cited 24×
  26. Queen v Pham [2015] HCA 39 Cited cited 225×
  27. R v Van Ryn [2016] NSWCCA 1 Cited cited 154×
  28. Hoskins v R [2016] NSWCCA 157 Cited cited 32×
  29. Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Beattie [2017] NSWCCA 301 Cited cited 86×
  30. Burr v R [2020] NSWCCA 282 Cited cited 35×
  31. GP (a pseudonym) v R [2021] NSWCCA 180 Cited cited 13×
  32. Russell v Carpenter [2022] NSWCA 252 Cited cited 7×
  33. R v RB [2022] NSWCCA 142 Cited cited 15×
  34. MK v R; RB v R [2023] NSWCCA 180 Cited cited 11×
  35. Xerri v The King [2024] HCA 5 Cited cited 9×
  36. MK v R [2024] NSWCCA 127 Cited cited 6×
  37. RA v R [2024] NSWCCA 149 Cited cited 8×
  38. R v Fisher [2024] NSWCCA 191 Cited cited 2×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.