Pinpoint · Judgment search

Hubner v ANZ Banking Group Ltd

[2000] FCA 140 ; (2000) 101 FCR 71

Federal Court of Australia · 25 February 2000 · Official judgment

Cited by 5 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 2 Cited 3

2000: 2 citing judgments 2001: 2 citing judgments 2008: 1 citing judgment 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Fernando v Ruddock [2000] FCA 1151 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  2. Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Heinrich [2000] FCA 1255 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  3. Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Rigg [2001] FCA 590 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  4. South Sydney District Rugby League Football Club Ltd v News Limited [2001] FCA 862 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  5. Harding v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2008] FCA 1403 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 5× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (6)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Stapleton v Brady [1952] QWN 15 Cited cited 3×
  2. Commissioner of Stamp Duties (NSW) v Owens (No 2) [1953] HCA 62 Applied or followed cited 28×
  3. Re East; Ex parte Nguyen [1998] HCA 73 Cited cited 64×
  4. (1999) 159 ALR 108 Cited
  5. Hubner v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [1999] FCA 385 Cited cited 8×
  6. Minogue v Williams [2000] FCA 125 Cited cited 139×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.