Pinpoint · Judgment search

Naing v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs

[2000] FCA 344 ; (2000) 97 FCR 336

Federal Court of Australia · 31 March 2000 · Official judgment

Cited by 17 indexed judgments

All Overruled or disapproved 1 Applied or followed 2 Cited 14

2000: 6 citing judgments 2001: 9 citing judgments, 1 negative 2003: 1 citing judgment 2008: 1 citing judgment 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Tharairasa v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 520 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 8× · judgment
  2. Zitoni v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 621 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  3. Nader v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 908 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 29× · judgment
  4. Tin v Minister for Immigration & Multicutural Affairs [2000] FCA 1109 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 61× · judgment
  5. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Zitoni [2000] FCA 1225 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  6. Bhasani v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1773 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 7× · judgment
  7. Paul v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 277 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  8. Carlos v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 301 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 11× · judgment
  9. Islam v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 430 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 6× · judgment
  10. Kola v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 630 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 12× · judgment
  11. Singh v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 857 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  12. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Al Shamry [2001] FCA 919 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 121× · judgment
  13. Huang v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1171 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  14. Paul v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1196 Overruled or disapproved Federal Court of Australia · cited 126× · judgment
  15. Singh v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1679 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 20× · judgment
  16. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v Awan [2003] FCAFC 140 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 14× · judgment
  17. SZLJC v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 1361 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (4)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [1999] FCA 1681 Cited cited 53×
  2. Maritime Union of Australia v Geraldton Port Authority [1999] FCA 174 Cited cited 3×
  3. Montes-Granados v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 60 Not followed cited 20×
  4. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Kandasamy [2000] FCA 67 Cited cited 14×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.