Pinpoint · Judgment search

Minister for Immigration, Multicultural Affairs and Citizenship v SZRHU

[2013] FCAFC 91 ; (2013) 215 FCR 35

Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · 14 August 2013 · Official judgment

Cited by 20 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 1 Cited 19

2013: 1 citing judgment 2014: 1 citing judgment 2015: 6 citing judgments 2016: 3 citing judgments 2018: 2 citing judgments 2019: 2 citing judgments 2020: 1 citing judgment 2021: 2 citing judgments 2022: 2 citing judgments 2013 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. SZQRM v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2013] FCA 1297 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  2. SZRTC v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCAFC 43 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 3× · judgment
  3. SZTOX v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 105 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  4. SZTOX v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 77 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 9× · judgment
  5. SZTBJ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1182 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  6. SZUDE v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1202 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  7. SZUBI v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1203 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  8. MZZXS v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1384 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  9. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZUSU [2016] FCAFC 50 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 5× · judgment
  10. SZUHM v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1198 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  11. Director of the Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate v Powell [2016] FCA 1287 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 6× · judgment
  12. BCI16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 851 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  13. SZNBX v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1172 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  14. DED16 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 18 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 1× · judgment
  15. SZVGQ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2019] FCA 1985 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  16. C7A/2017 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2020] FCAFC 63 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 7× · judgment
  17. Newman v Minister for Health and Aged Care [2021] FCA 517 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  18. DQD16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2021] FCA 1586 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  19. BMT19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 328 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  20. ABB19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 715 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (45)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. (1608) 2 How St Trials 559 Cited
  2. Potter v Minahan [1908] HCA 63 Cited cited 229×
  3. R v Smithers; Ex parte Benson (1912) 16 CLR 99 Cited cited 8×
  4. Judd v McKeon [1926] HCA 33 Cited cited 11×
  5. (1947) 9 Cam L J 330 Cited
  6. Chow Hung Ching v The King [1948] HCA 37 Cited cited 19×
  7. O'Keefe v Calwell [1949] HCA 6 Cited cited 34×
  8. R v Forbes; Ex parte Kwok Kwan Lee [1971] HCA 14 Cited cited 20×
  9. Ex parte De Braic [1971] HCA 15 Cited cited 10×
  10. Ex parte Henry [1975] HCA 62 Cited cited 15×
  11. (1977) Mayer v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1984) 55 ALR 587 Cited
  12. (1986) 15 Melb Univ Law Rev 662 Cited
  13. Nolan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1988] HCA 45 Cited cited 58×
  14. Air Caledonie International v Commonwealth [1988] HCA 61 Cited cited 54×
  15. Chu Kheng Lim v Minister for Immigration Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1992) 110 ALR 97 Cited cited 2×
  16. Chu Kheng Lim v Minister for Immigration [1992] HCA 64 Cited cited 352×
  17. (1997) 25 Fed L Rev 295 Cited
  18. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Thiyagarajah (1997) 80 FCR 543 Cited cited 75×
  19. Rajendran v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1998) 86 FCR 526 Cited cited 16×
  20. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Al-Sallal (1999) 94 FCR 549 Cited cited 26×
  21. Al-Zafiry v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 443 Cited cited 18×
  22. Sue v Hill [1999] HCA 30 Cited cited 104×
  23. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Haji Ibrahim [2000] HCA 55 Cited cited 94×
  24. Al-Rahal v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2001) 110 FCR 73 Cited cited 8×
  25. V856/00A v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1018 Overruled or disapproved cited 30×
  26. V872/00A v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1019 Cited
  27. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Applicant C [2001] FCA 1332 Overruled or disapproved cited 31×
  28. Applicant C v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 229 Cited cited 16×
  29. Kola v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 630 Cited cited 12×
  30. Re Patterson; Ex parte Taylor [2001] HCA 51 Cited cited 227×
  31. A v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2002) 122 FCR 57 Cited cited 10×
  32. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v Walsh [2002] FCAFC 205 Cited cited 6×
  33. WAGH v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 194 Overruled or disapproved cited 9×
  34. (2004) 25 Adel L Rev 137 Cited
  35. Singh v Commonwealth of Australia [2004] HCA 43 Cited cited 69×
  36. Re Woolley; Ex parte Applicants M276/2003 by their next friend GS [2004] HCA 49 Cited cited 62×
  37. (2005) 26 Aust Bar Rev 193 Cited
  38. NAGV and NAGW of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] HCA 6 Overruled or disapproved cited 56×
  39. Hwang v Commonwealth [2005] HCA 66 Cited cited 6×
  40. Koroitamana v Commonwealth of Australia [2006] HCA 28 Cited cited 10×
  41. SZHWI v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2007] FCA 900 Cited
  42. SZMWQ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] FCAFC 97 Cited cited 19×
  43. Rowe v Electoral Commissioner [2010] HCA 46 Cited cited 17×
  44. SZRHU v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2012] FMCA 1013 Cited
  45. SZRBJ v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2012] FMCA 1240 Cited cited 2×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.