Pinpoint · Judgment search

Applicant C v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs

[2001] FCA 229

Federal Court of Australia · 12 March 2001 · Official judgment

Cited by 16 indexed judgments

All Overruled or disapproved 1 Applied or followed 3 Cited 12

2001: 10 citing judgments, 1 negative 2002: 1 citing judgment 2008: 2 citing judgments 2010: 1 citing judgment 2013: 1 citing judgment 2015: 1 citing judgment 2001 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. S115/00A v The Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 540 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 8× · judgment
  2. Bitani v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 631 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 7× · judgment
  3. Kola v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 630 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 12× · judgment
  4. W228 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 860 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 8× · judgment
  5. V1043/00A v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 910 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  6. V856/00A v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1018 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 30× · judgment
  7. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Reza [2001] FCA 1321 Overruled or disapproved Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  8. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Applicant C [2001] FCA 1332 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 31× · judgment
  9. N1045/00A v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1546 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  10. Hussein v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1651 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  11. Applicants in V 722 of 2000 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 1059 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  12. SZLAN v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 904 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 6× · judgment
  13. SZGXK v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 1891 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  14. SZMWQ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] FCAFC 97 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 19× · judgment
  15. Minister for Immigration, Multicultural Affairs and Citizenship v SZRHU [2013] FCAFC 91 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 20× · judgment
  16. SZTBJ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1182 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (9)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Magyari v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1997) 50 ALD 341 Distinguished cited 3×
  2. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Thiyagarajah (1997) 80 FCR 543 Cited cited 75×
  3. Ratnayake, Palitha v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs & Anor [1997] FCA 482 Distinguished cited 4×
  4. Rajendran v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1998) 86 FCR 526 Cited cited 16×
  5. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Al-Sallal (1999) 94 FCR 549 Cited cited 26×
  6. Chen v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 34 Distinguished cited 23×
  7. Al-Rahal v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1005 Cited cited 8×
  8. Patto v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1554 Applied or followed cited 16×
  9. Lia v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 65 Distinguished cited 3×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.