Pinpoint · Judgment search

Montes-Granados v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs

[2000] FCA 60

Federal Court of Australia · 4 February 2000 · Official judgment

Cited by 20 indexed judgments

All Not followed 1 Distinguished 1 Applied or followed 6 Cited 12

1999: 1 citing judgment 2000: 16 citing judgments, 2 negative 2001: 1 citing judgment 2020: 1 citing judgment 2022: 1 citing judgment 1999 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Dhillon v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1878 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  2. Issa v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 128 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 5× · judgment
  3. Valdes v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 115 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  4. CR v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 255 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  5. Primatchek v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 517 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  6. Islam v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 362 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  7. Duzdiker v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 390 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  8. Duzdiker v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 391 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  9. Naing v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 344 Not followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 17× · judgment
  10. Tharairasa v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 520 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 8× · judgment
  11. McDade v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 528 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  12. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Farahanipour [2000] FCA 605 Distinguished Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  13. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Sameh [2000] FCA 578 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 19× · judgment
  14. Zitoni v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 621 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  15. Zaltni v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 399 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 6× · judgment
  16. X v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 702 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  17. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Singh [2000] FCA 845 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 231× · judgment
  18. Applicant in V488 of 2000 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1815 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  19. Semantic Software Asia Pacific Limited v Vince (Trustee), in the matter of Bradley (Bankrupt) [2020] FCA 1007 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  20. Bowman v Commonwealth of Australia [2022] FCA 594 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (24)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Donald Campbell & Co Ltd v Pollak [1927] AC 732 Applied or followed cited 122×
  2. Knight v Clifton [1971] Ch 700 Cited cited 47×
  3. Tekmat Investments Pty Ltd v Ward (1988) 81 ALR 278 Cited cited 5×
  4. Nguyen v Nguyen [1990] HCA 9 Applied or followed cited 107×
  5. Verna Trading Pty Ltd v New India Assurance Co Ltd [1991] 1 VR 129 Applied or followed cited 37×
  6. Australian Securities Commission v Marlborough Gold Mines Ltd [1993] HCA 15 Overruled or disapproved cited 493×
  7. Randhawa v MILGEA [1994] FCA 1253 Applied or followed cited 448×
  8. Byrne v Australian Airlines Ltd [1994] FCA 888 Applied or followed cited 52×
  9. Eshetu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1997) 71 FCR 300 Cited cited 110×
  10. Abdalla v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1998) 51 ALD 11 Cited cited 23×
  11. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Prathapan, Nagaratnam [1998] FCA 955 Applied or followed cited 23×
  12. Ex parte Robinson [1998] QB 929 Cited
  13. Qantas Airways Ltd v Cornwall (1999) 84 FCR 483 Applied or followed cited 5×
  14. Ahnee v Director of Public Prosecutions [1999] 2 WLR 1305 Cited cited 6×
  15. Muli v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1155 Cited cited 4×
  16. Q v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1202 Cited cited 3×
  17. Perampalam v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 165 Applied or followed cited 43×
  18. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [1999] FCA 1681 Applied or followed cited 53×
  19. Maritime Union of Australia v Geraldton Port Authority [1999] FCA 174 Cited cited 3×
  20. Xu v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1741 Cited cited 53×
  21. Shelton v Repatriation Commission [1999] FCA 181 Cited cited 22×
  22. Alphonsus v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 289 Cited cited 5×
  23. Sundararaj v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 692 Applied or followed cited 5×
  24. Sundararaj v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 76 Cited cited 4×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.