Pinpoint · Judgment search

SZQXE v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship

[2012] FCA 1292 ; (2012) 134 ALD 495

Federal Court of Australia · 21 November 2012 · Official judgment

Cited by 6 indexed judgments

All Cited 6

2017: 2 citing judgments 2018: 1 citing judgment 2019: 1 citing judgment 2021: 1 citing judgment 2022: 1 citing judgment 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. CPE15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 591 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 29× · judgment
  2. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v CQZ15 [2017] FCAFC 194 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 36× · judgment
  3. CSO15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 14 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 20× · judgment
  4. BMG17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 1281 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  5. ENP19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 220 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  6. CBV17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 1566 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (15)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Local Government and Ethnic Affairs v Mok (1994) 55 FCR 375 Cited cited 19×
  2. Randhawa v MILGEA [1994] FCA 1253 Cited cited 448×
  3. Immigration and Ethnic Affairs, Minister for v Wu Shan Liang [1996] HCA 6 Cited cited 2,712×
  4. Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs v Guo Wei Rong [1997] HCA 22 Cited cited 776×
  5. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Jama [1999] FCA 1680 Cited cited 3×
  6. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Sameh [2000] FCA 578 Cited cited 19×
  7. Applicant Z v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 325 Cited cited 4×
  8. WAAD v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCAFC 399 Cited cited 98×
  9. NAHI v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 10 Cited cited 358×
  10. NABE v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (No 2) [2004] FCAFC 263 Cited cited 637×
  11. SZMCD v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCAFC 46 Applied or followed cited 86×
  12. SZQEN v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 387 Cited cited 7×
  13. AZABO v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 525 Cited cited 2×
  14. AZABN v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 526 Cited cited 2×
  15. SZQXE v Minister for Immigration [2012] FMCA 643 Cited
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.