Pinpoint · Judgment search

Bond v The Queen

[2000] HCA 13 ; (2000) 201 CLR 213 ; (2000) 169 ALR 607

High Court of Australia · 9 March 2000 · Official judgment

Cited by 26 indexed judgments

All Distinguished 1 Applied or followed 2 Cited 23

2000: 7 citing judgments 2001: 3 citing judgments, 1 negative 2003: 2 citing judgments 2004: 1 citing judgment 2005: 1 citing judgment 2006: 3 citing judgments 2007: 2 citing judgments 2008: 1 citing judgment 2009: 1 citing judgment 2011: 3 citing judgments 2014: 1 citing judgment 2021: 1 citing judgment 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Matthews v Australian Securities Commission & Investments Commission [2000] FCA 288 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 12× · judgment
  2. The Queen v Hughes [2000] HCA 22 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 93× · judgment
  3. Eastman v The Queen [2000] HCA 29 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 161× · judgment
  4. Royal Queensland Aero Club ACN 009 660 806 v Civil Aviation Safety Authority [2000] FCA 848 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  5. Spies v The Queen [2000] HCA 43 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 101× · judgment
  6. Modbury Triangle Shopping Centre Pty Ltd v Anzil [2000] HCA 61 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 215× · judgment
  7. Crampton v The Queen [2000] HCA 60 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 117× · judgment
  8. Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Edensor Nominees Pty Ltd [2001] HCA 1 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 196× · judgment
  9. Deputy Commissioner of Taxation, In the Matter of Piccinin v Piccinin [2001] FCA 1609 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  10. R v PORTER [2001] NSWCCA 441 Distinguished NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 6× · judgment
  11. The Queen v Gee [2003] HCA 12 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 35× · judgment
  12. News Limited v South Sydney District Rugby League Football Club Limited [2003] HCA 45 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 84× · judgment
  13. Truong v The Queen [2004] HCA 10 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 50× · judgment
  14. REGINA v Darko JANCESKI [2005] NSWCCA 281 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 99× · judgment
  15. S v Australian Crime Commission [2006] FCAFC 5 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 5× · judgment
  16. Zentai v Republic of Hungary [2006] FCA 1226 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  17. Sydney Catchment Authority v Bailey [2006] NSWLEC 616 Cited Land and Environment Court of NSW · cited 3× · judgment
  18. Williams v United States of America [2007] FCAFC 109 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 2× · judgment
  19. Taylor v Rudaks [2007] FCA 1962 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 6× · judgment
  20. MZXOT v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] HCA 28 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 17× · judgment
  21. GG v Australian Crime Commission [2009] FCA 759 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 7× · judgment
  22. Lacey v Attorney-General of Queensland [2011] HCA 10 Applied or followed High Court of Australia · cited 153× · judgment
  23. Kutlu v Director of Professional Services Review [2011] FCAFC 94 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 11× · judgment
  24. Haskins v The Commonwealth [2011] HCA 28 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 15× · judgment
  25. Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) on behalf of the Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v El Ali, Khoder (No 1) [2014] NSWLC 28 Cited Local Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  26. Ozgen v R [2021] NSWCCA 252 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 2× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (20)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Connecticut Fire Insurance Co v Kavanagh [1892] AC 473 Cited cited 27×
  2. Re Aldridge (1893) 15 NZLR 361 Cited cited 7×
  3. Suttor v Gundowda Pty Ltd [1950] HCA 35 Cited cited 525×
  4. (1966) 2 Federal Law Review 37 Cited cited 4×
  5. Griffiths v The Queen [1977] HCA 44 Cited cited 233×
  6. R v Duncan; Ex parte Australian Iron and Steel Pty Ltd [1983] HCA 29 Cited cited 21×
  7. University of Wollongong v Metwally [1984] HCA 74 Cited cited 78×
  8. University of Wollongong v Metwally (No 2) [1985] HCA 28 Cited cited 557×
  9. GJ Coles & Co Ltd v Retail Trade Industrial Tribunal (1986) 7 NSWLR 503 Cited cited 27×
  10. Coulton v Holcombe [1986] HCA 33 Cited cited 1,127×
  11. Re Cram; Ex parte NSW Colliery Proprietors' Association Ltd [1987] HCA 28 Cited cited 61×
  12. Water Board v Moustakas [1988] HCA 12 Cited cited 413×
  13. Mickelberg v The Queen [1989] HCA 35 Cited cited 187×
  14. Malvaso v The Queen [1989] HCA 58 Cited cited 106×
  15. Everett v The Queen [1994] HCA 49 Cited cited 214×
  16. Gipp v The Queen [1998] HCA 21 Cited cited 143×
  17. Byrnes v The Queen (1999) 164 ALR 520 Cited cited 10×
  18. (1999) 27 Federal Law Review 1 Cited
  19. Byrnes v The Queen (1999) 73 ALJR 1292 Cited cited 8×
  20. Cassell v The Queen [2000] HCA 8 Cited cited 17×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.