Pinpoint · Judgment search

Inderjit Singh v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs

[2001] FCA 73 ; (2001) 109 FCR 18

Federal Court of Australia · 16 February 2001 · Official judgment

Cited by 19 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 3 Cited 16

2001: 7 citing judgments 2002: 3 citing judgments 2003: 3 citing judgments 2005: 1 citing judgment 2006: 1 citing judgment 2007: 1 citing judgment 2012: 1 citing judgment 2013: 1 citing judgment 2017: 1 citing judgment 2001 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. X v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 253 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  2. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Sarrazola [2001] FCA 263 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 53× · judgment
  3. Ezeribe v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 275 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  4. Wang v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 448 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 12× · judgment
  5. Quan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 945 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  6. Applicant in V346 of 2000 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1179 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  7. Abedi v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1430 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  8. X v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCAFC 3 ; [2002] FCA 56 [2002] FCAFC 3 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 17× · judgment
  9. W360/01A v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCAFC 211 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 23× · judgment
  10. Lee v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 305 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 15× · judgment
  11. Comcare v Moon [2003] FCA 569 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 12× · judgment
  12. Fabry v Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia [2003] FCA 1043 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  13. NANI v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1082 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  14. NBHP v Minister for Immigration, Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1857 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  15. SZEBS v Minister for Immigration, Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCA 456 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  16. Pongrass Group Operations Pty Limited v Minister for Planning & Anor [2007] NSWLEC 638 Cited Land and Environment Court of NSW · cited 5× · judgment
  17. Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZQOY [2012] FCAFC 131 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 13× · judgment
  18. Minister for Immigration, Multicultural Affairs and Citizenship v SZRNY [2013] FCAFC 104 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 3× · judgment
  19. NAPF v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 117 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (20)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Jones v Dunkel [1959] HCA 8 Applied or followed cited 2,918×
  2. Stead v State Government Insurance Commission [1986] HCA 54 Cited cited 682×
  3. Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Kurtovic [1990] FCA 19 Applied or followed cited 139×
  4. Bushell v Repatriation Commission [1992] HCA 47 Cited cited 227×
  5. Repatriation Commission v Owens (1996) 70 ALJR 904 Cited cited 57×
  6. Leung v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1997) 79 FCR 460 Cited
  7. Leung, Vincent Tze Ching & Anor v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1997] FCA 1313 Cited cited 29×
  8. Jayasinghe, Shantha Karunaratna v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs & Anor [1997] FCA 551 Cited cited 34×
  9. Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs v Guo Wei Rong [1997] HCA 22 Cited cited 776×
  10. Nguyen v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1998) 88 FCR 206 Cited cited 21×
  11. Paramananthan, Kirushanthan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Sivarasa, Vijayakumar [1998] FCA 1693 Cited cited 126×
  12. Sellamuthu v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 247 Applied or followed cited 170×
  13. Addo v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 940 Cited cited 56×
  14. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Bhardwaj (2000) 79 FCR 251 Cited
  15. Semunigus v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 240 Cited cited 35×
  16. Akand v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 626 Cited cited 3×
  17. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Bhardwaj [2000] FCA 789 Cited cited 14×
  18. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Singh [2000] FCA 845 Cited cited 231×
  19. Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte Aala [2000] HCA 57 Cited cited 962×
  20. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Thiyagarajah [2000] HCA 9 Cited cited 81×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.