Federal Court of Australia · 1 June 2001 · Official judgment
No indexed judgment cites this case yet.
The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.
[1993] FCA 456 Cited cited 845×[1995] HCA 58 Cited cited 1,391×[1964] AC 40 Cited cited 93×[1966] HCA 69 Cited cited 109×[1985] HCA 67 Distinguished cited 118×[1986] HCA 7 Cited cited 336×[1991] HCA 33 Cited cited 97×[1992] HCA 57 Cited cited 375×[1996] HCA 6 Cited cited 2,712×[1949] HCA 26 Cited cited 337×[1989] HCA 62 Cited cited 873×[1990] HCA 33 Cited cited 2,077×[1990] HCA 21 Cited cited 736×[1990] HCA 20 Cited cited 647×[1993] FCA 456 Cited cited 845×(1997) 81 FCR 71 Cited cited 142×[1997] FCA 1488 Cited cited 5×[1938] HCA 34 Cited cited 3,164×[1947] EWCA Civ 1 Cited cited 715×[1959] HCA 8 Cited cited 2,918×[1986] HCA 40 Cited cited 2,191×[1986] HCA 54 Cited cited 682×[1993] HCA 78 Cited cited 520×[2000] HCA 57 Cited cited 962×[2001] HCA 30 Cited cited 1,750×[1986] HCA 40 Cited cited 2,191×[1990] HCA 33 Cited cited 2,077×[1995] HCA 58 Cited cited 1,391×[1966] HCA 69 Cited cited 109×[1985] HCA 67 Distinguished cited 118×[1986] HCA 7 Cited cited 336×[1992] HCA 57 Cited cited 375×[1996] HCA 6 Cited cited 2,712×[1989] HCA 62 Cited cited 873×[1990] HCA 33 Cited cited 2,077×[1990] HCA 21 Cited cited 736×[1993] FCA 456 Cited cited 845×[1999] HCA 21 Cited cited 971×[2000] HCA 57 Cited cited 962×[2001] HCA 17 Cited cited 848×[1938] HCA 34 Cited cited 3,164×[1959] HCA 8 Cited cited 2,918×[1985] HCA 81 Cited cited 1,205×[1990] HCA 33 Cited cited 2,077×[1996] HCA 6 Cited cited 2,712×[1989] HCA 62 Cited cited 873×[1990] HCA 33 Cited cited 2,077×[1990] HCA 21 Cited cited 736×[1993] FCA 456 Cited cited 845×[2000] HCA 63 Cited cited 1,161×[1984] HCA 64 Cited cited 606×[1986] HCA 39 Cited cited 487×[1999] HCA 27 Cited cited 469×[2000] HCA 48 Applied or followed cited 574×Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.
[1993] FCA 456
Cited cited 845× [1995] HCA 58
Cited cited 1,391× [1996] HCA 6
Cited cited 2,712× (1997) 81 FCR 71
Cited cited 142× [1997] FCA 1488
Cited cited 5× [2000] HCA 57
Cited cited 962× [2001] HCA 17
Cited cited 848× [2001] HCA 30
Cited cited 1,750× Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.
Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.
Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.
Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.