Pinpoint · Judgment search

R v Pennisi

[2001] NSWCCA 326

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 4 September 2001 · Official judgment

Cited by 13 indexed judgments

All Cited 13

2003: 1 citing judgment 2005: 1 citing judgment 2006: 1 citing judgment 2007: 1 citing judgment 2015: 1 citing judgment 2016: 2 citing judgments 2017: 2 citing judgments 2019: 1 citing judgment 2020: 2 citing judgments 2023: 1 citing judgment 2001 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Regina v Bryan Steven JOHNSON [2003] NSWCCA 129 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 36× · judgment
  2. Regina v Schumacher [2005] NSWCCA 335 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment
  3. WILLIAMS v. REGINA; SAUNDERS v. REGINA [2006] NSWCCA 33 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 9× · judgment
  4. R v Cavanough [2007] NSWSC 561 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 4× · judgment
  5. Villalon v R [2015] NSWCCA 229 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 6× · judgment
  6. R v Misiepo [2016] NSWSC 565 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  7. R v Anderson [2016] NSWSC 399 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 3× · judgment
  8. R v Farhad Qaumi, Mumtaz Qaumi & Jamil Qaumi (Sentence) [2017] NSWSC 774 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 12× · judgment
  9. Merrick v R [2017] NSWCCA 264 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 15× · judgment
  10. R v Aljubouri; R v YA; R v Shaker [2019] NSWSC 180 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 5× · judgment
  11. Magro v R [2020] NSWCCA 25 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 34× · judgment
  12. Dean v R [2020] NSWCCA 317 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 3× · judgment
  13. R v Zarshoy [2023] NSWSC 1177 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (9)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. R v Hill (1981) 3 A Crim R 397 Cited cited 121×
  2. R v Moffitt (1990) 20 NSWLR 114 Cited cited 111×
  3. R v Phelan (1993) 66 A Crim R 446 Cited cited 52×
  4. R v Isaacs (1997) 41 NSWLR 374 Cited cited 278×
  5. R v Bryant [1999] NSWCCA 181 Cited cited 8×
  6. Regina v Oinonen [1999] NSWCCA 310 Cited cited 80×
  7. R v Simpson [2000] NSWCCA 284 Cited
  8. R v THOMSON; R v HOULTON [2000] NSWCCA 309 Cited cited 2,216×
  9. R v Guiseppina ESPOSITO [2000] NSWSC 284 Cited
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.