Pinpoint · Judgment search

R v Martinez; R v Tortell (No. 6)

[2020] NSWSC 267

Supreme Court of NSW · 20 March 2020 · Official judgment

Cited by 2 indexed judgments

All Cited 2

2020: 1 citing judgment 2022: 1 citing judgment 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. R v Martinez; R v Tortell (No. 7) [2020] NSWSC 361 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  2. Martinez v R [2022] NSWCCA 12 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 8× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (19)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. R v Hill (1981) 3 A Crim R 397 Cited cited 121×
  2. R v Olbrich [1999] HCA 54 Cited cited 1,119×
  3. Cheung v The Queen [2001] HCA 67 Cited cited 222×
  4. REGINA v SIMPSON [2001] NSWCCA 534 Cited cited 682×
  5. Weininger v The Queen [2003] HCA 14 Cited cited 242×
  6. GAS v The Queen [2004] HCA 22 Applied or followed cited 133×
  7. REGINA v Warren Alan FORBES [2005] NSWCCA 377 Cited cited 124×
  8. Regina v Van Xuan Nguyen [2005] NSWSC 600 Cited cited 14×
  9. KT v R [2008] NSWCCA 51 Cited cited 293×
  10. R v JW [2010] NSWCCA 49 Cited cited 162×
  11. Filippou v The Queen [2015] HCA 29 Cited cited 283×
  12. Merrick v R [2017] NSWCCA 264 Cited cited 15×
  13. Tepania v R [2018] NSWCCA 247 Cited cited 224×
  14. Brown v R [2018] NSWCCA 257 Cited cited 7×
  15. Martinez v R; Tortell v R [2019] NSWCCA 153 Cited cited 11×
  16. Tabbah v R [2019] NSWCCA 324 Cited cited 15×
  17. R v Martinez; R v Tortell (No. 5) [2019] NSWSC 1665 Cited cited 3×
  18. Strbak v The Queen [2020] HCA 10 Cited cited 31×
  19. Magro v R [2020] NSWCCA 25 Applied or followed cited 34×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.