Pinpoint · Judgment search

Merrick v R

[2017] NSWCCA 264

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 17 November 2017 · Official judgment

Cited by 15 indexed judgments

All Cited 15

2018: 3 citing judgments 2019: 2 citing judgments 2020: 5 citing judgments 2021: 3 citing judgments 2022: 1 citing judgment 2023: 1 citing judgment 2017 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. R v Tarrant [2018] NSWSC 774 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 5× · judgment
  2. Ignatov v R [2018] NSWCCA 217 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 2× · judgment
  3. TWM v R [2018] NSWCCA 276 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · judgment
  4. R v Magro [2019] NSWSC 343 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 7× · judgment
  5. R v Yardley [2019] NSWCCA 291 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment
  6. Magro v R [2020] NSWCCA 25 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 34× · judgment
  7. R v Martinez; R v Tortell (No. 6) [2020] NSWSC 267 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  8. R v Feroz; R v Ho; R v Hoang; R v Nguyen; R v Trinh [2020] NSWSC 341 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  9. R v Crockford [2020] NSWDC 628 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  10. Environment Protection Authority v Warwick Ronald McInnes (No 2) [2020] NSWLEC 147 Cited Land and Environment Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  11. Richey v R [2021] NSWCCA 93 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · judgment
  12. R v Golding [2021] NSWDC 322 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  13. R v D [2021] NSWDC 483 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  14. Martinez v R [2022] NSWCCA 12 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 8× · judgment
  15. Chief Executive of the Office of Environment and Heritage v Turnbull [2023] NSWLEC 137 Cited Land and Environment Court of NSW · cited 3× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (15)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. House v The King [1936] HCA 40 Cited cited 4,342×
  2. Wilson v The Queen [1992] HCA 31 Cited cited 92×
  3. M v The Queen [1994] HCA 63 Cited cited 970×
  4. Regina v Oinonen [1999] NSWCCA 310 Cited cited 80×
  5. R v THOMSON; R v HOULTON [2000] NSWCCA 309 Cited cited 2,216×
  6. R v Pennisi [2001] NSWCCA 326 Cited cited 13×
  7. MFA v The Queen [2002] HCA 53 Cited cited 513×
  8. Cameron v The Queen [2002] HCA 6 Cited cited 349×
  9. REGINA v SHARMA [2002] NSWCCA 142 Cited cited 215×
  10. Regina v Bryan Steven JOHNSON [2003] NSWCCA 129 Cited cited 36×
  11. R v Cardoso [2003] NSWCCA 15 Cited cited 40×
  12. Regina v Stambolis [2006] NSWCCA 56 Cited cited 71×
  13. Libke v The Queen [2007] HCA 30 Cited cited 249×
  14. SKA v The Queen [2011] HCA 13 Cited cited 428×
  15. R v Merrick (No 5) [2016] NSWSC 661 Cited cited 4×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.