Pinpoint · Judgment search

R v TOYER

[2021] NSWDC 69

District Court of NSW · 12 March 2021 · Official judgment

Cited by 1 indexed judgment

All Cited 1

2021: 1 citing judgment 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. R v TOYER (NO 2) [2021] NSWDC 92 Cited District Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (37)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. R v Hill (1981) 3 A Crim R 397 Cited cited 121×
  2. R v Weinman (1987) 49 SASR 248 Cited cited 23×
  3. R v Dodd (1991) 57 A Crim R 349 Cited cited 385×
  4. R v Brown [1993] 2 All ER 75 Cited cited 2×
  5. R v Edwards (1996) 90 A Crim R 510 Cited cited 200×
  6. R v McIntosh [1999] VSC 358 Cited cited 3×
  7. R v Woodland [2001] NSWSC 416 Cited cited 19×
  8. Regina v DAETZ; Regina v WILSON [2003] NSWCCA 216 Cited cited 77×
  9. R v Dica [2004] EWCA Crim 1103 Cited cited 3×
  10. REGINA v HOERLER [2004] NSWCCA 184 Cited cited 69×
  11. R v Trevenna [2004] NSWCCA 43 Cited cited 77×
  12. R v MD, BM, NA, JT [2005] NSWCCA 342 Cited cited 57×
  13. REGINA v Warren Alan FORBES [2005] NSWCCA 377 Cited cited 124×
  14. R v Stein [2007] VSCA 300 Cited cited 4×
  15. R v HA [2008] NSWSC 1368 Cited cited 8×
  16. R v Wilkinson (No. 5) [2009] NSWSC 432 Cited cited 187×
  17. Hili v The Queen [2010] HCA 45 Cited cited 1,194×
  18. Neal v R [2011] VSCA 172 Cited cited 2×
  19. R v Melissa MCKEOWN [2013] NSWDC 22 Cited cited 27×
  20. R v Loveridge [2014] NSWCCA 120 Cited cited 90×
  21. Brown v R [2014] NSWCCA 215 Cited cited 25×
  22. R v Smith, Jarad [2016] NSWCCA 75 Cited cited 27×
  23. R v Steven Barnett [2016] NSWDC 302 Cited cited 12×
  24. Parente v R [2017] NSWCCA 284 Cited cited 149×
  25. R v Pullen [2018] NSWCCA 264 Cited cited 110×
  26. R v Fangaloka [2019] NSWCCA 173 Cited cited 92×
  27. Casella v R [2019] NSWCCA 201 Cited cited 37×
  28. Karout v R [2019] NSWCCA 253 Cited cited 48×
  29. Cross v R [2019] NSWCCA 280 Cited cited 10×
  30. R v Tristan LEE [2019] NSWDC 59 Cited cited 5×
  31. R v Magro [2019] NSWSC 343 Cited cited 7×
  32. Fangaloka v The Queen [2020] HCASL 12 Doubted cited 11×
  33. Karout v The Queen [2020] HCASL 56 Doubted cited 11×
  34. Wany v DPP [2020] NSWCA 318 Cited cited 51×
  35. R v CAHILL; R v BYRNE [2020] NSWDC 224 Cited cited 3×
  36. R v ELPHICK [2021] NSWDC 1 Cited cited 8×
  37. R v TOYER (NO 2) [2021] NSWDC 92 Cited cited 2×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.