Pinpoint · Judgment search

R v Tarrant

[2018] NSWSC 774

Supreme Court of NSW · 29 May 2018 · Official judgment

Cited by 5 indexed judgments

All Cited 5

2018: 1 citing judgment 2019: 1 citing judgment 2021: 2 citing judgments 2023: 1 citing judgment 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. R v Cahill (No. 4) [2018] NSWSC 1896 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 7× · judgment
  2. R v Raquel Hutchison [2019] NSWSC 25 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 3× · judgment
  3. R v Reid (No. 2) [2021] NSWSC 475 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 3× · judgment
  4. R v Hong [2021] NSWSC 1487 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  5. Camilleri v R [2023] NSWCCA 106 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 10× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (28)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. R v Hill (1981) 3 A Crim R 397 Cited cited 121×
  2. R v Todd (1982) 2 NSWLR 517 Applied or followed cited 109×
  3. R v Runjanjic (1991) 56 SASR 114 Cited cited 11×
  4. Osland v The Queen [1998] HCA 75 Cited cited 129×
  5. R v GREEN [1999] NSWCCA 97 Cited cited 22×
  6. Regina v Dally [2000] NSWCCA 162 Cited cited 24×
  7. REGINA v SIMPSON [2001] NSWCCA 534 Cited cited 682×
  8. R v Peters [2002] NSWSC 1234 Cited cited 4×
  9. R v MD, BM, NA, JT [2005] NSWCCA 342 Cited cited 57×
  10. REGINA v Warren Alan FORBES [2005] NSWCCA 377 Cited cited 124×
  11. R v Hamid [2006] NSWCCA 302 Cited cited 101×
  12. SZ v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 19 Cited cited 148×
  13. R v Wilkinson (No. 5) [2009] NSWSC 432 Cited cited 187×
  14. Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194 Applied or followed cited 1,099×
  15. Potts v R [2012] NSWCCA 229 Cited cited 34×
  16. Catley v R [2014] NSWCCA 249 Cited cited 6×
  17. R v Barbieri, Mitchell; R v Barbieri, Fiona [2014] NSWSC 1808 Cited cited 4×
  18. Director of Public Prosecutions (Vic) v Williams [2014] VSC 304 Cited
  19. Villalon v R [2015] NSWCCA 229 Cited cited 6×
  20. R v Roff [2015] NSWSC 1853 Cited cited 7×
  21. Ukropina v R [2016] NSWCCA 277 Cited cited 6×
  22. R v Jenbare [2016] NSWSC 1317 Cited cited 2×
  23. R v Tarrant [2016] NSWSC 892 Cited cited 2×
  24. Roff v R [2017] NSWCCA 208 Cited cited 8×
  25. Merrick v R [2017] NSWCCA 264 Cited cited 15×
  26. Liyanage v Western Australia [2017] WASCA 112 Cited
  27. Tarrant v R [2018] NSWCCA 21 Cited cited 22×
  28. R v TP [2018] NSWSC 369 Cited cited 4×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.