Pinpoint · Judgment search

Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Nguyen

[2002] FCA 460

Federal Court of Australia · 15 April 2002 · Official judgment

Cited by 16 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 2 Cited 14

2002: 2 citing judgments 2003: 2 citing judgments 2004: 5 citing judgments 2005: 1 citing judgment 2006: 4 citing judgments 2007: 2 citing judgments 2002 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Iftikhar v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1123 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  2. Akter v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1504 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  3. Gerhard v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 495 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 7× · judgment
  4. Liu v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1170 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  5. Ji v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 207 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  6. Hasan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 788 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  7. Quan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 764 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  8. Zhou v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1078 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  9. Tian v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 238 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 18× · judgment
  10. Yoshua v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1553 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  11. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v Zhou [2006] FCAFC 96 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 8× · judgment
  12. Shang v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 1453 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  13. Sayem v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 1478 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  14. Liyanage v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 1489 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  15. Wang v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 488 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  16. Cheng v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2007] FCAFC 71 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 2× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (1)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Bertran v Vanstone [2000] FCA 359 Cited cited 9×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.