Pinpoint · Judgment search

Bertran v Vanstone

[2000] FCA 359 ; (2000) 173 ALR 63

Federal Court of Australia · 27 March 2000 · Official judgment

Cited by 9 indexed judgments

All Not followed 1 Applied or followed 2 Cited 6

2000: 2 citing judgments 2001: 2 citing judgments 2002: 3 citing judgments, 1 negative 2008: 1 citing judgment 2015: 1 citing judgment 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Cabal v United Mexican States (No 3) [2000] FCA 1204 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 37× · judgment
  2. Cabal v Vanstone [2000] FCA 1306 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 7× · judgment
  3. Cabal v United Mexican States [2001] FCA 427 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 48× · judgment
  4. Cabal v Attorney-General of the Commonwealth [2001] FCA 583 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 20× · judgment
  5. Pasini v United Mexican States [2002] HCA 3 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 47× · judgment
  6. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Nguyen [2002] FCA 460 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 16× · judgment
  7. Akter v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1504 Not followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  8. Karsten v Federal Republic of Germany [2008] FCA 331 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  9. Marku v Minister for Justice [2015] FCA 831 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 6× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (56)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Freer v Murray [1894] AC 576 Distinguished
  2. Re Arton [1896] 1 QB 108 Cited cited 8×
  3. Tower Justices v Chambers [1904] 2 KB 903 Distinguished
  4. R v Governor of Brixton Prison [1911] 2 KB 82 Cited cited 2×
  5. Ex parte Walsh and Johnson; In re Yates [1925] HCA 53 Cited cited 86×
  6. L Joseph Pty Ltd v Gray (1939) 56 WN (NSW) 190 Cited cited 3×
  7. R v Connell; Ex parte Hetton Bellbird Collieries Ltd [1944] HCA 42 Cited cited 253×
  8. Ex parte Hebburn Ltd; Re Kearsley Shire Council [1947] NSWStRp 24 Cited cited 118×
  9. Jones v Dunkel [1959] HCA 8 Cited cited 2,918×
  10. Zacharia v Republic of Cyprus [1963] AC 634 Cited cited 3×
  11. Atkinson v United States of America Government [1971] AC 197 Cited cited 7×
  12. Parramatta City Council v Pestell [1972] HCA 59 Cited cited 70×
  13. Kolotex Hosiery (Australia) Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1975] HCA 5 Cited cited 34×
  14. Buck v Bavone [1976] HCA 24 Cited cited 325×
  15. R. v Governor of Pentonville Prison; ex parte Narang [1978] AC 247 Cited cited 6×
  16. (1982) 74 Cr App R 302 Cited cited 2×
  17. Commonwealth v Tasmania [1983] HCA 21 Cited cited 183×
  18. Bates v McDonald (1985) 2 NSWLR 89 Cited cited 9×
  19. Prasad v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1985) 6 FCR 155 Distinguished cited 286×
  20. Videto v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1985] FCA 449 Distinguished cited 45×
  21. Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd [1986] HCA 40 Distinguished cited 2,191×
  22. Barrett v Minister for Immigration (1989) 18 ALD 129 Distinguished cited 24×
  23. Re Coldham; Ex parte Brideson [1989] HCA 2 Cited cited 53×
  24. Karina Fisheries v Mitson (1990) 29 FCR 473 Cited cited 2×
  25. Karina Fisheries Pty Ltd v Mitson [1990] FCA 154 Distinguished cited 23×
  26. Thiel v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1990] HCA 37 Cited cited 65×
  27. R v Governor of Pentonville Prison; Ex parte Sinclair [1991] 2 AC 64 Cited cited 3×
  28. (1992) 3 Criminal Law Forum 225 Cited
  29. Gray v Minister for Immigration (1992) 38 FCR 351 Cited cited 6×
  30. Re Operative Plasterers Workers Federation of Australia; Ex parte Brown (1992) 67 ALJR 179 Cited cited 5×
  31. (1992) 76 Minn L Rev 1017 Cited
  32. Re Boyne Smelters Ltd Ex parte Federation of Industrial Manufacturing and Engineering Employers of Australia (1993) 177 CLR 446 Cited cited 8×
  33. Weissensteiner v The Queen [1993] HCA 65 Cited cited 135×
  34. Harris v Attorney-General (Cth) (1994) 52 FCR 386 Applied or followed cited 75×
  35. R v Horseferry Road Magistrates' Court; Ex parte Bennett [1994] 1 AC 42 Cited cited 19×
  36. Lego Australia Pty Ltd v Paraggio [1994] FCA 1286 Distinguished cited 37×
  37. (1995) 1 J Intl Legal Stud 151 Cited
  38. Simonsz v Minister for Immigration (1995) 56 FCR 492 Distinguished cited 4×
  39. Re Schmidt [1995] 1 AC 339 Cited cited 2×
  40. Minister of State for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Teoh [1995] HCA 20 Distinguished cited 502×
  41. Public Prosecutions (Cth), Director of v Kainhofer [1995] HCA 35 Cited cited 87×
  42. (1996) 19 Fordham Int'l LJ 1636 Cited
  43. Flanagan, John & Ors v Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police & Ors [1996] FCA 16 Distinguished cited 45×
  44. Immigration and Ethnic Affairs, Minister for v Wu Shan Liang [1996] HCA 6 Applied or followed cited 2,712×
  45. [1997] 3 All ER 961 Cited
  46. Carmody, Christopher John v Mackellar, Paul Stephen & Ors [1997] FCA 839 Distinguished cited 13×
  47. Puglisi, Joseph & Anor v The Australian Fisheries Management Authority & Ors [1997] FCA 846 Distinguished cited 27×
  48. Mining and Energy Union v Giudice (1998) 159 ALR 1 Cited cited 12×
  49. (1998) 24 J Legis 111 Cited
  50. Malubel Pty Ltd v Elder (1998) 88 FCR 242 Distinguished cited 12×
  51. (1998) 92 AJIL 187 Cited
  52. R v Staines Magistrates' Court; ex parte Westfallen [1998] 4 All ER 210 Cited cited 3×
  53. R v Martin [1998] AC 917 Cited cited 3×
  54. [1999] 3 WLR 1244 Cited
  55. Foster v Senator Amanda Vanstone [1999] FCA 1447 Distinguished cited 5×
  56. Bou-Simon v Attorney General [2000] FCA 24 Distinguished cited 8×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.