Pinpoint · Judgment search

Daihatsu Australia Pty Limited v Commissioner of Taxation

[2001] FCA 588 ; (2001) 184 ALR 576

Federal Court of Australia · 24 May 2001 · Official judgment

Cited by 20 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 3 Cited 17

2002: 13 citing judgments 2003: 2 citing judgments 2005: 2 citing judgments 2007: 1 citing judgment 2022: 1 citing judgment 2023: 1 citing judgment 2001 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. SAAG v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 547 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 36× · judgment
  2. NAAG of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 713 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 59× · judgment
  3. Kan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 923 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 5× · judgment
  4. NAAV v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 228 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 289× · judgment
  5. Ng v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 1146 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  6. NAAQ of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 300 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 3× · judgment
  7. QAAE of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1213 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  8. QAAB of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1220 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  9. Wu v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1242 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 9× · judgment
  10. NAGT of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 319 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 4× · judgment
  11. WABZ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 1345 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  12. NAAC of 2001 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 1344 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  13. SCAZ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1377 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 13× · judgment
  14. Applicant WAFV of 2002 v Refugee Review Tribunal [2003] FCA 16 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 15× · judgment
  15. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v NAOS of 2002 [2003] FCAFC 142 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 13× · judgment
  16. SZEBX v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1197 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  17. Holmwood Holdings Pty Ltd v Halkat Electrical Contractors Pty Ltd & Anor [2005] NSWSC 1129 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 36× · judgment
  18. Golden Chef (NSW) Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2007] FCA 874 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  19. Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Widdup [2022] FCA 1403 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  20. Fulton v Chief of Defence Force [2023] FCAFC 134 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (15)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. R v Hickman; Ex parte Fox and Clinton [1945] HCA 53 Applied or followed cited 479×
  2. Holloway v McFeeters [1956] HCA 25 Applied or followed cited 154×
  3. Ex parte Briggs (1986) 12 FCR 301 Cited cited 22×
  4. O'Toole v Charles David Pty Ltd [1991] HCA 14 Cited cited 103×
  5. Sunrise Auto Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Sunrise Auto Ltd Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Sunrise Auto Ltd [1995] FCA 969 Cited cited 14×
  6. Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Richard Walter Pty Ltd [1995] HCA 23 Cited cited 172×
  7. Madden v Madden (1996) 65 FCR 354 Applied or followed cited 13×
  8. Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1996) 72 FCR 175 Cited cited 21×
  9. VANMELD PTY LIMITED v FAIRFIELD CITY COUNCIL & ANOR [1999] NSWCA 6 Cited cited 74×
  10. Kordan Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2000] FCA 1807 Applied or followed cited 23×
  11. Corporation of the City of Enfield v Development Assessment Commission [2000] HCA 5 Cited cited 407×
  12. Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte Aala [2000] HCA 57 Cited cited 962×
  13. (2001) 12 PLR 17 Cited cited 4×
  14. (2001) 12 Public Law Review 17 Cited cited 7×
  15. Cabal v Attorney-General of the Commonwealth [2001] FCA 583 Cited cited 20×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.