Pinpoint · Judgment search

R v Sparos

[2002] NSWCCA 52

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 12 March 2002 · Official judgment

Cited by 1 indexed judgment

All Cited 1

2006: 1 citing judgment 2002 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Jesse Daniel Heilpern v R [2006] NSWCCA 311 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (24)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. R v Bachelor (1952) 36 CAR 64 Cited cited 4×
  2. R v Rushby (1977) 1 NSWLR 594 Cited cited 70×
  3. Yardley v Betts (1979) 22 SASR 108 Cited cited 66×
  4. R v Tait and Bartley (1979) 24 ALR 473 Cited cited 53×
  5. R v Wilton (1981) 28 SASR 362 Cited cited 14×
  6. R v White (1981) 28 SASR 9 Cited cited 19×
  7. R v Jermyn (1985) 2 NSWLR 194 Applied or followed cited 9×
  8. R v Hayes (1987) 29 A Crim R 452 Cited cited 18×
  9. R v Blocki (1991) 56 SASR 250 Cited cited 2×
  10. R v Dodd (1991) 57 A Crim R 349 Cited cited 385×
  11. R v J (1992) 59 SASR 145 Cited cited 5×
  12. (1993) 67 A Crim R 487 Cited cited 2×
  13. R v Morgan (1993) 70 A Crim R 368 Cited cited 195×
  14. R v Allpass (1993) 72 A Crim R 561 Cited cited 158×
  15. Everett v The Queen [1994] HCA 49 Cited cited 214×
  16. Comptroller-General of Customs v D'Aquino Bros Pty Ltd (1996) 135 ALR 649 Applied or followed cited 12×
  17. R v Mills [1998] 4 VR 235 Cited cited 4×
  18. Regina v HOWLAND [1999] NSWCCA 10 Cited cited 27×
  19. R v Bavadra [2000] NSWCCA 292 Cited cited 64×
  20. DPP v Waack (2001) 121 A Crim R 134 Cited
  21. R v Blackman and Walters [2001] NSWCCA 121 Cited cited 99×
  22. Regina v Perese [2001] NSWCCA 478 Cited cited 6×
  23. R v Barton [2001] NSWCCA 63 Cited cited 47×
  24. KT v R [2008] NSWCCA 51 Cited cited 293×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.