Pinpoint · Judgment search

R v SLD

[2002] NSWSC 758

Supreme Court of NSW · 30 August 2002 · Official judgment

Cited by 9 indexed judgments

All Cited 9

2002: 1 citing judgment 2017: 1 citing judgment 2020: 1 citing judgment 2021: 1 citing judgment 2023: 2 citing judgments 2024: 3 citing judgments 2002 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. R v SJB and McLean [2002] NSWSC 1042 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · judgment
  2. R v Terkmani (No 2) [2017] NSWSC 1567 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · judgment
  3. State of New South Wales v SLD (Preliminary) [2020] NSWSC 1803 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 3× · judgment
  4. State of New South Wales v SLD (Final) [2021] NSWSC 409 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  5. State of New South Wales v SLD (Preliminary) [2023] NSWSC 330 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  6. R v BE [2023] NSWSC 1007 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 6× · judgment
  7. R v BL [2024] NSWSC 51 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 4× · judgment
  8. BE v R [2024] NSWCCA 100 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment
  9. State of New South Wales v SLD (Preliminary) [2024] NSWSC 1645 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (16)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. [1988] AC 407 Cited
  2. Veen v The Queen (No 2) [1988] HCA 14 Cited cited 1,716×
  3. In R v Pham & Ly (1991) 55 A Crim R 128 Cited cited 119×
  4. R v WKR (1993) 32 NSWLR 447 Cited cited 47×
  5. R v Engert (1995) 84 A Crim R 67 Cited cited 454×
  6. R v Wright (1997) 93 A Crim R 48 Cited cited 197×
  7. R v Previtera (1997) 94 A Crim R 76 Cited cited 318×
  8. R v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Ex parte Venables [1998] AC 407 Cited cited 15×
  9. [1998] AC 467 Cited
  10. REGINA v KAMA [2000] NSWCCA 23 Cited cited 37×
  11. Re Thompson [2001] 1 All ER 737 Cited
  12. Regina v SDM [2001] NSWCCA 158 Cited cited 27×
  13. R v HEARNE [2001] NSWCCA 37 Cited cited 182×
  14. Cameron v The Queen [2002] HCA 6 Cited cited 349×
  15. REGINA v SHARMA [2002] NSWCCA 142 Cited cited 215×
  16. KT v R [2008] NSWCCA 51 Cited cited 293×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.