Pinpoint · Judgment search

R v Teasdale

[2004] NSWCCA 91 ; (2004) 145 A Crim R 345

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 16 April 2004 · Official judgment

Cited by 13 indexed judgments

All Cited 13

2004: 1 citing judgment 2007: 1 citing judgment 2008: 1 citing judgment 2009: 1 citing judgment 2011: 2 citing judgments 2012: 1 citing judgment 2013: 1 citing judgment 2014: 1 citing judgment 2018: 1 citing judgment 2020: 1 citing judgment 2021: 1 citing judgment 2023: 1 citing judgment 2004 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. R v Liristis [2004] NSWCCA 287 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 20× · judgment
  2. Puchalski v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 220 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 9× · judgment
  3. Makarov v R (No. 2) [2008] NSWCCA 292 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 5× · judgment
  4. R v Hay; Hay v R [2009] NSWCCA 228 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment
  5. R v Perish; R v Lawton; R v Perish [2011] NSWSC 1112 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · judgment
  6. R v Hawi & ors (No 30) [2011] NSWSC 1676 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · judgment
  7. Soames v R [2012] NSWCCA 188 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 5× · judgment
  8. Paul Darcey Armstrong v R [2013] NSWCCA 113 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 8× · judgment
  9. Ibrahim v R [2014] NSWCCA 160 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 3× · judgment
  10. R v Patel (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 342 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · judgment
  11. R v Hawkins (No 5) [2020] NSWSC 1410 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · judgment
  12. Medich v R [2021] NSWCCA 36 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 14× · judgment
  13. ZL v R [2023] NSWCCA 279 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (10)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Director of Public Prosecutions (Nauru) v Fowler [1984] HCA 48 Cited cited 53×
  2. M v The Queen [1994] HCA 63 Cited cited 970×
  3. Jones v The Queen [1997] HCA 56 Cited cited 311×
  4. R v Hasenkamp [1998] NSWSC 40 Cited
  5. REGINA v. KNEEBONE [1999] NSWCCA 279 Applied or followed cited 75×
  6. REGINA v. WALTON [1999] NSWCCA 452 Applied or followed cited 12×
  7. Spies v The Queen [2000] HCA 43 Cited cited 101×
  8. R v Kennedy [2000] NSWCCA 487 Applied or followed cited 36×
  9. Regina v Pedrana [2001] NSWCCA 66 Cited cited 7×
  10. R v Stavrinos [2003] NSWCCA 339 Cited
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.