Pinpoint · Judgment search

Watson v R

[2022] NSWCCA 208

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 23 September 2022 · Official judgment

Cited by 4 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 2 Cited 2

2022: 1 citing judgment 2023: 2 citing judgments 2024: 1 citing judgment 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. R v Watson (No 3) [2022] NSWSC 1693 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  2. Haines v R; Brown v R [2023] NSWCCA 108 Applied or followed NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · judgment
  3. Rassi v R [2023] NSWCCA 119 Applied or followed NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 6× · judgment
  4. Khoury v R [2024] NSWCCA 19 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (24)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. House v The King [1936] HCA 40 Cited cited 4,342×
  2. Crofts v The Queen [1996] HCA 22 Cited cited 159×
  3. REGINA v Warren Alan FORBES [2005] NSWCCA 377 Cited cited 124×
  4. The Queen v Edwards [2009] HCA 20 Cited cited 76×
  5. GAR v R (No 2) [2010] NSWCCA 164 Cited cited 16×
  6. Clark v R [2010] NSWCCA 94 Cited cited 11×
  7. TRIEU v R [2012] NSWCCA 169 Cited cited 12×
  8. R v Ahola (No 6) [2013] NSWSC 703 Cited cited 17×
  9. R v Hunter (No 8) [2014] NSWSC 1151 Cited cited 3×
  10. Mikael v Regina [2015] NSWCCA 294 Cited cited 8×
  11. Barber v R; Zraika v R [2016] NSWCCA 125 Cited cited 10×
  12. R v Lamb; R v Mason; R v Hill [2016] NSWCCA 135 Cited cited 8×
  13. Younan v R [2016] NSWCCA 248 Cited cited 8×
  14. Curran v R [2017] NSWCCA 123 Cited cited 4×
  15. Moubarak by his tutor Coorey v Holt [2019] NSWCA 102 Cited cited 74×
  16. Hamide v R [2019] NSWCCA 219 Cited cited 22×
  17. Pratten v R [2021] NSWCCA 251 Cited cited 7×
  18. Libdy v R [2021] NSWCCA 34 Cited cited 2×
  19. Medich v R [2021] NSWCCA 36 Cited cited 14×
  20. Zheng v R; Li v R; Pan v R [2021] NSWCCA 78 Cited cited 10×
  21. Hoang v The Queen [2022] HCA 14 Cited cited 5×
  22. Vella v R [2022] NSWCCA 204 Cited
  23. Haile v R [2022] NSWCCA 71 Cited cited 15×
  24. R v Watson [2022] NSWSC 1243 Cited cited 2×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.