Pinpoint · Judgment search

Telstra Corporation Limited v Minister for Communications, Information Technology and the Arts (No. 2)

[2007] FCA 1445

Federal Court of Australia · 12 September 2007 · Official judgment

Cited by 37 indexed judgments

All Distinguished 1 Applied or followed 2 Cited 34

2007: 2 citing judgments, 1 negative 2008: 1 citing judgment 2009: 4 citing judgments 2010: 4 citing judgments 2011: 2 citing judgments 2012: 1 citing judgment 2013: 3 citing judgments 2014: 1 citing judgment 2015: 2 citing judgments 2016: 2 citing judgments 2019: 3 citing judgments 2020: 1 citing judgment 2021: 5 citing judgments 2022: 5 citing judgments 2025: 1 citing judgment 2007 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Rilstone v BP Australia Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 1557 Distinguished Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  2. Rich v Harrington [2007] FCA 1987 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 30× · judgment
  3. Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd (ACN 004 551 473) v Amcor Limited (ACN 000 017 372) [2008] FCA 88 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 25× · judgment
  4. Hawke v WorkCover Authority of New South Wales [2009] NSWADT 62 Cited Administrative Decisions Tribunal (NSW) · judgment
  5. Chan v Department of Education & Training [2009] NSWADT 85 Cited Administrative Decisions Tribunal (NSW) · cited 1× · judgment
  6. Bailey v Department of Land and Water Conservation [2009] NSWCA 100 Cited NSW Court of Appeal · cited 50× · judgment
  7. Betfair Pty Limited v Racing New South Wales (No 7) [2009] FCA 1140 (Corrigenda dated 12 and 19 October 2009) [2009] FCA 1140 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 19× · judgment
  8. Chan v Department of Education and Training (GD) [2010] NSWADTAP 7 Cited ADT Appeal Panel (NSW) · cited 10× · judgment
  9. Banksia Mortgages Limited v Croker and Ors [2010] NSWSC 535 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 9× · judgment
  10. Media Ocean Limited v Optus Mobile Pty Limited (No 7) [2010] FCA 892 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  11. Dye v Commonwealth Securities Ltd (No 5) [2010] FCA 950 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 10× · judgment
  12. SL v University of Sydney [2011] NSWADT 65 Cited Administrative Decisions Tribunal (NSW) · cited 12× · judgment
  13. McGuirk v NSW Police Force [2011] NSWADT 155 Cited Administrative Decisions Tribunal (NSW) · judgment
  14. Apple Inc. v Samsung Electronics Co. Limited (No 2) [2012] FCA 1358 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  15. Nash v Glennies Creek Coal Management Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] NSWIRComm 67 Cited Industrial Relations Commission of NSW · cited 11× · judgment
  16. Archer Capital 4A Pty Ltd as trustee for the Archer Capital Trust 4A v Sage Group plc (No 2) [2013] FCA 1098 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 49× · judgment
  17. AQJ v University of New South Wales [2013] NSWADT 306 Cited Administrative Decisions Tribunal (NSW) · cited 2× · judgment
  18. Saggers v Environment Protection Authority [2014] NSWCATAD 37 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 18× · judgment
  19. Zonnevylle v Department of Education and Communities [2015] NSWCATAD 10 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 14× · judgment
  20. Starr v Superannuation Administration Corporation [2015] NSWCATAD 76 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 9× · judgment
  21. Lonsdale v University of Sydney [2016] NSWCATAD 176 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 3× · judgment
  22. Gold and Copper Resource Pty Limited v NSW Trade and Investment [2016] NSWCATAD 267 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 3× · judgment
  23. Martin v Norton Rose Fulbright Australia (No 2) [2019] FCA 96 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 7× · judgment
  24. Martin v Norton Rose Fulbright Australia [2019] FCA 1101 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 10× · judgment
  25. Jackson v University of New South Wales [2019] NSWCATAD 224 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 21× · judgment
  26. Friday v Minister for Primary Industry and Resources [2020] FCA 984 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  27. Imielska v NSW Land and Housing Corporation [2021] NSWCATAD 74 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 1× · judgment
  28. EMC v The University of Sydney [2021] NSWCATAD 234 Applied or followed NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 5× · judgment
  29. Broadbent v Commissioner of Police [2021] NSWCATAD 287 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 1× · judgment
  30. Else v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2021] NSWCATAD 317 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · judgment
  31. FlyBlue Management Pty Ltd v NSW Crown Lands Department [2021] NSWCATAD 322 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 1× · judgment
  32. Commissioner of Taxation v PricewaterhouseCoopers [2022] FCA 278 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 6× · judgment
  33. FlyBlue Management Pty Ltd v NSW Crown Lands Department (Department of Planning and Environment) [2022] NSWCATAD 167 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · judgment
  34. Zonnevylle v Secretary, Department of Education [2022] NSWCATAD 187 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 5× · judgment
  35. Community Resource Network v NSW Department of Justice [2022] NSWCATAD 363 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · judgment
  36. Quach v MLC Limited [2022] FCAFC 202 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 4× · judgment
  37. Scully v Sydney Metro [2025] NSWCATAD 3 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (18)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Grant v Downs [1976] HCA 63 Cited cited 328×
  2. Waterford v Commonwealth [1987] HCA 25 Cited cited 456×
  3. National Crime Authority v S [1991] FCA 234 Cited cited 95×
  4. Re Compass Airlines Pty Ltd (1992) 35 FCR 447 Cited cited 21×
  5. Hartogen Energy Ltd (in liq) v Australian Gas Light Co [1992] FCA 322 Cited cited 47×
  6. Benecke v National Australia Bank (1993) 35 NSWLR 110 Cited cited 73×
  7. R v Derby Magistrates Court; Ex parte B [1996] 1 AC 487 Cited cited 6×
  8. Alphapharm Pty Ltd v Eli Lilly Australia Pty Ltd [1996] FCA 391 Cited cited 32×
  9. Commissioner of Australian Federal Police v Propend Finance Pty Ltd [1997] HCA 3 Cited cited 298×
  10. Mann v Carnell [1999] HCA 66 Cited cited 514×
  11. Esso Australia Resources Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1999] HCA 67 Cited cited 453×
  12. DSE (Holdings) Pty Ltd v InterTAN Inc [2003] FCA 1191 Cited cited 85×
  13. Kennedy v Wallace [2004] FCAFC 337 Cited cited 89×
  14. Three Rivers District Council v Governor and Company of the Bank of England (No 6) [2004] UKHL 48 Cited cited 38×
  15. Seven Network Limited v News Limited [2005] FCA 142 Cited cited 50×
  16. Leighton Contractors Pty Limited (ABN 98 000 893 667) v Page Kirkland Management Pty Limited (ABN 46 097 111 245) [2006] FCA 288 Cited cited 12×
  17. Commissioner of Taxation v Rio Tinto Limited [2006] FCAFC 86 Cited cited 111×
  18. Barnes v Commissioner of Taxation [2007] FCAFC 88 Cited cited 64×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.