Pinpoint · Judgment search

R v Tortell, R v Tsegay

[2007] NSWCCA 313

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 15 November 2007 · Official judgment

Cited by 15 indexed judgments

All Cited 15

2007: 1 citing judgment 2009: 4 citing judgments 2012: 1 citing judgment 2014: 3 citing judgments 2015: 2 citing judgments 2018: 1 citing judgment 2019: 1 citing judgment 2021: 1 citing judgment 2025: 1 citing judgment 2007 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. R v Craig John DREW [2007] NSWCCA 331 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · judgment
  2. R v Raniga [2009] NSWCCA 35 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · judgment
  3. R v Les FERENC [2009] NSWCCA 126 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 2× · judgment
  4. R v Fadi JAJOU; R v Maher JEBARA; R v Sam LAFTA [2009] NSWCCA 167 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 4× · judgment
  5. HILLIER v DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (NSW) [2009] NSWCCA 312 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 17× · judgment
  6. R v Speechley [2012] NSWCCA 130 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 71× · judgment
  7. R v CMB [2014] NSWCCA 5 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 70× · judgment
  8. R v Joshua Mitchell; R v Michael Mitchell [2014] NSWCCA 33 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 2× · judgment
  9. R v Reeves [2014] NSWCCA 154 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 13× · judgment
  10. R v Cahill [2015] NSWCCA 53 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 36× · judgment
  11. McDonald v R [2015] NSWCCA 280 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 5× · judgment
  12. Kim v R [2018] NSWCCA 254 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · judgment
  13. R v Toohey [2019] NSWCCA 182 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 8× · judgment
  14. R v Kirk [2021] NSWDC 389 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  15. R v Weldon [2025] NSWCCA 21 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (26)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. House v The King [1936] HCA 40 Cited cited 4,342×
  2. R v Geddes [1936] NSWStRp 35 Cited cited 89×
  3. Griffiths v The Queen [1977] HCA 44 Cited cited 233×
  4. R v Tait [1979] FCA 32 Cited cited 135×
  5. R v Holder (1983) 3 NSWLR 245 Cited cited 181×
  6. R v Holder [1983] 3 NSWLR 245 Cited cited 196×
  7. R v Hicks (1987) 45 SASR 270 Cited cited 3×
  8. Malvaso v The Queen [1989] HCA 58 Cited cited 106×
  9. R v Papazis (1991) 51 A Crim R 242 Cited cited 51×
  10. R v Allpass (1993) 72 A Crim R 561 Cited cited 158×
  11. Everett v The Queen [1994] HCA 49 Cited cited 214×
  12. Lowndes v The Queen [1999] HCA 29 Cited cited 405×
  13. REGINA v KYROGLOU & TSOUKATOS [1999] NSWCCA 106 Cited cited 11×
  14. REGINA v HENRY BARBER TRAN SILVER TSOUKATOS KYROGLOU JENKINS [1999] NSWCCA 111 Cited cited 1,285×
  15. REGINA v. HORNE [1999] NSWCCA 391 Cited cited 8×
  16. Regina v Griggs [2000] 111 A Crim R 233 Cited cited 2×
  17. Dinsdale v The Queen [2000] HCA 54 Cited cited 929×
  18. REGINA v BAKER [2000] NSWCCA 85 Cited cited 184×
  19. Wong v The Queen [2001] HCA 64 Cited cited 1,044×
  20. R v Blackman and Walters [2001] NSWCCA 121 Cited cited 99×
  21. R v Wall [2002] NSWCCA 42 Cited cited 146×
  22. R v Hernando [2002] NSWCCA 489 Cited cited 60×
  23. ATTORNEY GENERAL'S APPLICATION UNDER s37 OF THE CRIMES (SENTENCING PROCEDURE) ACT 1999 NO 1 OF 2002 [2002] NSWCCA 518 Cited cited 871×
  24. R v Hemsley [2004] NSWCCA 228 Cited cited 228×
  25. GADSDEN v R [2005] NSWCCA 453 Cited cited 4×
  26. R v Burns [2007] NSWCCA 228 Cited cited 22×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.