Pinpoint · Judgment search

Repatriation Commission v Green

[2008] FCA 1614

Federal Court of Australia · 30 October 2008 · Official judgment

Cited by 1 indexed judgment

All Cited 1

2011: 1 citing judgment 2008 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Onorato v Repatriation Commission [2011] FCA 1507 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (16)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. East v Repatriation Commission [1987] FCA 24 Cited cited 65×
  2. Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond [1990] HCA 33 Cited cited 2,077×
  3. Repatriation Commission v Bey, Michael George [1997] FCA 1347 Cited cited 41×
  4. Repatriation Commission v Cooke (1998) 90 FCR 307 Cited cited 22×
  5. Repatriation Commission v Deledio, Ena Mavis [1998] FCA 391 Cited cited 143×
  6. McKenna v Repatriation Commission [1999] FCA 323 Cited cited 18×
  7. Repatriation Commission v Budworth (2001) 116 FCR 200 Cited cited 19×
  8. W252/01A v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 50 Cited
  9. Whitworth v Repatriation Commission [2003] FCA 1530 Cited
  10. White v Repatriation Commission [2004] FCA 633 Cited cited 6×
  11. Wm Wrigley Jr Company v Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 1035 Cited cited 19×
  12. Lawrance v Centrelink [2005] FCA 1318 Cited cited 3×
  13. Citicorp Life Insurance Ltd v Smith [2005] FCAFC 102 Cited cited 13×
  14. Milagros Green v Repatriation Commission [2006] AATA 397 Cited
  15. Repatriation Commission v Milenz [2006] FCA 1436 Cited cited 3×
  16. Cavenett v Commonwealth [2007] VSCA 88 Cited
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.