Pinpoint · Judgment search

R v AD

[2008] NSWCCA 289 ; (2008) 191 A Crim R 409

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 9 December 2008 · Official judgment

Cited by 19 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 1 Cited 18

2009: 2 citing judgments 2010: 1 citing judgment 2011: 4 citing judgments 2012: 1 citing judgment 2013: 1 citing judgment 2015: 2 citing judgments 2017: 1 citing judgment 2018: 1 citing judgment 2019: 3 citing judgments 2020: 2 citing judgments 2022: 1 citing judgment 2008 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Police v ATM [2009] NSWLC 7 Applied or followed Local Court of NSW · judgment
  2. HILLIER v DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (NSW) [2009] NSWCCA 312 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 17× · judgment
  3. DPP -v- Schaeffer [2010] NSWLC 29 Cited Local Court of NSW · judgment
  4. Police v Anton Karel TOCIN [2011] NSWLC 24 Cited Local Court of NSW · judgment
  5. Police v JM [2011] NSWChC 1 [2011] NSWCHC 1 Cited Children’s Court of NSW · judgment
  6. Police v Kathy May MILLER [2011] NSWLC 21 Cited Local Court of NSW · judgment
  7. Inspector Regan v King [2011] NSWIRComm 105 Cited Industrial Relations Commission of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  8. R v DW [2012] NSWCCA 66 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 47× · judgment
  9. Dang v R [2013] NSWCCA 246 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 18× · judgment
  10. R v Feuerstein [2015] NSWCCA 82 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 4× · judgment
  11. Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Johnson [2015] NSWLC 31 Cited Local Court of NSW · judgment
  12. R v MOK, Hin Lok [2017] NSWDC 314 Cited District Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  13. R v DOHERTY, Carl William [2018] NSWDC 120 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  14. DPP (Cth) v Sean David WALSH [2019] NSWDC 60 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  15. R v TURNER [2019] NSWDC 206 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  16. R v Casey [2019] NSWDC 751 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  17. R v ALI [2020] NSWDC 125 Cited District Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  18. R v RB [2020] NSWDC 328 Cited District Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  19. R v STOLL; R v McGRATH; R v SMITH; R v TRIFFIT [2022] NSWDC 612 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (42)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. R v Richards (1981) 2 NSWLR 464 Cited cited 28×
  2. R v Richards [1981] 2 NSWLR 464 Cited cited 16×
  3. R v Ellis (1986) 6 NSWLR 603 Cited cited 239×
  4. Veen v The Queen (No 2) [1988] HCA 14 Cited cited 1,716×
  5. R v Cartwright (1989) 17 NSWLR 243 Cited cited 208×
  6. R v Moffitt (1990) 20 NSWLR 114 Cited cited 111×
  7. R v Readman (1990) 47 A Crim R 181 Cited cited 41×
  8. R v Gallagher (1991) 23 NSWLR 220 Cited cited 236×
  9. R v Chu [1998] NSWSC 568 Cited cited 4×
  10. REGINA v TRAN [1999] NSWCCA 109 Cited cited 102×
  11. R v Brown [1999] NSWCCA 323 Cited cited 26×
  12. R v Pang [1999] NSWCCA 4 Cited cited 44×
  13. Dinsdale v The Queen [2000] HCA 54 Cited cited 929×
  14. R v THOMSON; R v HOULTON [2000] NSWCCA 309 Cited cited 2,216×
  15. Regina v Wheeler [2000] NSWCCA 34 Cited cited 100×
  16. R v Hammoud [2000] NSWCCA 540 Cited cited 199×
  17. Ryan v The Queen [2001] HCA 21 Cited cited 307×
  18. R v Smith & Jones [2001] NSWCCA 279 Cited cited 4×
  19. REGINA v SIMPSON [2001] NSWCCA 534 Cited cited 682×
  20. R v Wall [2002] NSWCCA 42 Applied or followed cited 146×
  21. R v Gorman [2002] NSWCCA 516 Applied or followed cited 54×
  22. ATTORNEY GENERAL'S APPLICATION UNDER s37 OF THE CRIMES (SENTENCING PROCEDURE) ACT 1999 NO 1 OF 2002 [2002] NSWCCA 518 Cited cited 871×
  23. R v Colleen Halls and Francis Halls [2002] NSWCCA 55 Cited cited 8×
  24. Regina v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131 Cited cited 907×
  25. R v OPA [2004] NSWCCA 464 Cited cited 26×
  26. R v Ceissman [2004] NSWCCA 466 Cited cited 22×
  27. Regina v John Gordon Porteous [2005] NSWCCA 115 Cited cited 12×
  28. Regina v AMT [2005] NSWCCA 151 Cited cited 20×
  29. Regina v Janceski [2005] NSWCCA 288 Cited cited 69×
  30. Regina v Frank Waqa (No 2) [2005] NSWCCA 33 Cited cited 25×
  31. R v Misiepo [2005] NSWCCA 405 Cited cited 7×
  32. Regina v Darrell Terry McNaughton [2006] NSWCCA 242 Cited cited 487×
  33. Regina v MMK [2006] NSWCCA 272 Cited cited 183×
  34. Regina v Z [2006] NSWCCA 342 Cited cited 33×
  35. R v M.A.K., R v M.S.K. [2006] NSWCCA 381 Cited cited 369×
  36. Callaghan v R [2006] NSWCCA 58 Cited cited 180×
  37. Regina v Joseph Sukkar [2006] NSWCCA 92 Cited cited 114×
  38. Lewins v R [2007] NSWCCA 189 Cited cited 45×
  39. SZ v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 19 Cited cited 148×
  40. S v R [2008] NSWCCA 186 Cited cited 19×
  41. Lu v Regina [2008] NSWCCA 261 Cited
  42. KAUWENBERGHS, Tim Leon Mon v R (Cth) [2008] NSWCCA 98 Cited cited 12×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.