Pinpoint · Judgment search

SZNCT v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship

[2009] FCA 907

Federal Court of Australia · 21 August 2009 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Authorities cited (29)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Ex parte Davis [1901] NSWStRp 71 Cited cited 8×
  2. F Hoffmann-La Roche & Co AG v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [1975] AC 295 Cited cited 122×
  3. Prasad v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1985) 6 FCR 155 Applied or followed cited 286×
  4. Luu v Renevier [1989] FCA 518 Cited cited 156×
  5. Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond [1990] HCA 33 Applied or followed cited 2,077×
  6. Knight v FP Special Assets Ltd [1992] HCA 28 Applied or followed cited 442×
  7. Immigration and Ethnic Affairs, Minister for v Wu Shan Liang [1996] HCA 6 Cited cited 2,712×
  8. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Epeabaka [1999] FCA 1 Cited cited 69×
  9. X v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 995 Cited cited 17×
  10. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu [1999] HCA 21 Applied or followed cited 971×
  11. Foxtel Management Pty Ltd v Australian Competition & Consumer Commission [2000] FCA 589 Cited cited 16×
  12. Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Cassim [2000] HCA 50 Applied or followed cited 35×
  13. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Anthonypillai [2001] FCA 274 Applied or followed cited 128×
  14. Gomez v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 480 Applied or followed cited 52×
  15. SCAW v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 810 Applied or followed
  16. Odhiambo v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCAFC 194 Cited cited 19×
  17. SBAH of 2001 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 426 Applied or followed cited 11×
  18. SFGB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 231 Cited cited 81×
  19. NABE v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (No 2) [2004] FCAFC 263 Applied or followed cited 637×
  20. Mohammed v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCAFC 47 Applied or followed cited 3×
  21. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v NBDS [2006] FCA 265 Applied or followed cited 7×
  22. Applicant S214 of 2003 v Refugee Review Tribunal [2006] FCA 375 Cited cited 8×
  23. Manton International Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2006] FCAFC 76 Applied or followed
  24. Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Le [2007] FCA 1318 Cited cited 84×
  25. SZIAI v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 1372 Cited cited 15×
  26. SZJXW v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 143 Cited cited 2×
  27. S1925 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2008] FCA 246 Applied or followed cited 2×
  28. Citrus Queensland Pty Ltd v Sunstate Orchards Pty Ltd (No 10) [2009] FCA 498 Cited cited 21×
  29. SZNCT & SZNCU v Minister for Immigration [2009] FMCA 233 Cited cited 2×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.