Pinpoint · Judgment search

Chand v Rail Corporation of New South Wales (No 3)

[2010] NSWADTAP 11

ADT Appeal Panel (NSW) · 2 March 2010 · Official judgment

Cited by 38 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 16 Cited 22

2010: 3 citing judgments 2011: 2 citing judgments 2012: 1 citing judgment 2014: 5 citing judgments 2015: 7 citing judgments 2016: 3 citing judgments 2017: 2 citing judgments 2018: 1 citing judgment 2019: 2 citing judgments 2020: 6 citing judgments 2021: 1 citing judgment 2022: 1 citing judgment 2023: 3 citing judgments 2024: 1 citing judgment 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. B & L Linings Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (No 5) (RD) [2010] NSWADTAP 21 Cited ADT Appeal Panel (NSW) · cited 22× · judgment
  2. O'Neill v Henry (No. 2) (Costs) (RLD) [2010] NSWADTAP 54 Cited ADT Appeal Panel (NSW) · cited 5× · judgment
  3. Chand v RailCorp [2010] NSWCA 233 Cited NSW Court of Appeal · cited 2× · judgment
  4. Chand v RailCorp [2011] NSWCA 79 Cited NSW Court of Appeal · cited 5× · judgment
  5. Chand v RailCorp (No 2) [2011] NSWCA 80 Cited NSW Court of Appeal · cited 5× · judgment
  6. Molyneux v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (RD) [2012] NSWADTAP 53 Cited ADT Appeal Panel (NSW) · cited 166× · judgment
  7. Jackson v NSW Land and Housing Corporation [2014] NSWCATAP 22 Applied or followed NCAT Appeal Panel · cited 545× · judgment
  8. Di Salvo v Leung [2014] NSWCATAP 44 Applied or followed NCAT Appeal Panel · cited 19× · judgment
  9. Chen v Baxter [2014] NSWCATAP 50 Cited NCAT Appeal Panel · cited 4× · judgment
  10. Bersich v Quinlan Bulk Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 51 Applied or followed NCAT Appeal Panel · cited 1× · judgment
  11. Habib v State of New South Wales (NSW Police Force) [2014] NSWCATAP 70 Cited NCAT Appeal Panel · cited 21× · judgment
  12. Australian Barter Exchange Pty Ltd v Ma Victoria Cezina trading as Immia Cleaning Services [2015] NSWCATAP 13 Applied or followed NCAT Appeal Panel · judgment
  13. Susan L Couch v BMD Removals Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCATAP 25 Applied or followed NCAT Appeal Panel · judgment
  14. Kida Park Pty Ltd t/as Capital Steel Buildings v Rutten [2015] NSWCATAP 40 Cited NCAT Appeal Panel · judgment
  15. Daoud v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2015] NSWCATAD 53 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 10× · judgment
  16. Concourt Pty Ltd v Victoria Mary Kerr [2015] NSWCATAP 106 Cited NCAT Appeal Panel · cited 4× · judgment
  17. Corbett v Burns [2015] NSWCATAP 172 Applied or followed NCAT Appeal Panel · cited 1× · judgment
  18. Mackay v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2015] NSWCATAD 259 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · judgment
  19. Jubian v Clark; Clark v Jubian [2016] NSWCATAP 56 Cited NCAT Appeal Panel · cited 4× · judgment
  20. Davis t/as Local Bloke Removals v Drady & Burridge [2016] NSWCATAP 84 Applied or followed NCAT Appeal Panel · judgment
  21. D W Tolson Management Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2016] NSWCATAD 113 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 6× · judgment
  22. Walsh v Sandeberg & Anor [2017] NSWCATAP 38 Applied or followed NCAT Appeal Panel · judgment
  23. Boscolo v NSW Land and Housing Corporation [2017] NSWCATAP 210 Applied or followed NCAT Appeal Panel · cited 2× · judgment
  24. Florida Kitchens Pty Ltd v No 1 Cutting Service Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCATAP 281 Cited NCAT Appeal Panel · cited 4× · judgment
  25. Holdsworth v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2019] NSWCATAD 42 Applied or followed NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 1× · judgment
  26. Giammarco and Giammarco v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2019] NSWCATAD 77 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 3× · judgment
  27. Phillips v Willoughby Retirement Community Association [2020] NSWCATCD 9 Applied or followed NCAT Consumer and Commercial · judgment
  28. Nicholson v Office of Local Government [2020] NSWCATOD 162 Applied or followed NCAT Occupational · judgment
  29. Ferella v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2020] NSWCATAD 128 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 2× · judgment
  30. Krajsic v eBay Marketplaces GmbH [2020] NSWCATAP 137 Applied or followed NCAT Appeal Panel · judgment
  31. EKH v Burran Darai Aboriginal Corporation Inc [2020] NSWCATAD 266 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 1× · judgment
  32. Ferella v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2020] NSWCATAD 327 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 1× · judgment
  33. Deputy Secretary, Local Government Planning and Policy v Cornish [2021] NSWCATOD 35 Cited NCAT Occupational · cited 3× · judgment
  34. ZYK v Soo [2022] NSWCATAP 135 Applied or followed NCAT Appeal Panel · judgment
  35. Durastyle Homes Pty Limited v Gosling [2023] NSWCATAP 111 Cited NCAT Appeal Panel · judgment
  36. Joiner v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2023] NSWCATAP 254 Applied or followed NCAT Appeal Panel · cited 3× · judgment
  37. Li v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2023] NSWCATAD 330 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · judgment
  38. Jali Local Aboriginal Land Council v Anderson [2024] NSWCATOD 197 Applied or followed NCAT Occupational · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (15)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Calderbank v Calderbank [1975] 3 ALL ER 333 Cited cited 16×
  2. Blake v Norris [1990] 20 NSWLR 300 Cited
  3. Z -v- University of A, Dr D & B (No. 4) [2002] NSWADT 14 Cited cited 10×
  4. Lupevo Pty Ltd t/a Ampol Nabiac -v- Bree [2002] NSWADTAP 9 Cited cited 24×
  5. Irresistible Frocks Salon Pty Ltd v Sparbac Pty Ltd and Roche Group Pty Ltd (No 2) [2004] NSWADT 72 Cited cited 16×
  6. AMACA PTY LTD v CREMER & ORS [2006] NSWCA 164 Cited cited 21×
  7. Chand v State Rail Authority [2007] NSWADT 90 Cited cited 5×
  8. Chand v Rail Corporation of New South Wales (EOD) [2007] NSWADTAP 54 Cited cited 29×
  9. NZ V Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police (GD) [2008] NSWADTAP 23 Cited cited 8×
  10. State of New South Wales (Justice Health) and anor v Dezfouli [2008] NSWADTAP 69 Cited cited 103×
  11. MAHENTHIRARASA v STATE RAIL AUTHORITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES (NO 2) [2008] NSWCA 201 Cited cited 80×
  12. LD v Director General, Department of Education and Training and anor [2009] NSWADT 14 Cited cited 3×
  13. Lynch v Alan Hingston as trustee for the AP Family Trust trading as Grafton Sawmilling [2009] NSWADT 263 Cited cited 4×
  14. Chand v Rail Corporation of NSW (No 2) [2009] NSWADTAP 27 Cited cited 23×
  15. Hingston v Lynch (EOD) [2010] NSWADTAP 1 Cited cited 2×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.