Pinpoint · Judgment search

Department of Justice and Attorney General v AY (GD)

[2010] NSWADTAP 17

ADT Appeal Panel (NSW) · 23 March 2010 · Official judgment

Cited by 5 indexed judgments

All Cited 5

2010: 1 citing judgment 2015: 1 citing judgment 2016: 1 citing judgment 2022: 1 citing judgment 2023: 1 citing judgment 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Marshall v Dental Decor Pty Ltd t/as Westmead Gentle Dental [2010] NSWADT 173 Cited Administrative Decisions Tribunal (NSW) · cited 2× · judgment
  2. Macedo v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2015] NSWCATAD 193 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 1× · judgment
  3. Herbert v American Express Australia Ltd and Ors (No. 2) [2016] NSWCATCD 98 Cited NCAT Consumer and Commercial · cited 4× · judgment
  4. FCZ v Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District [2022] NSWCATAD 79 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 3× · judgment
  5. Schwedler v Secretary, Department of Health, Sydney Local Health District [2023] NSWCATAD 300 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (20)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. House v The King [1936] HCA 40 Cited cited 4,342×
  2. In re the Will of F. B. Gilbert (deceased) (1946) 63 WN (NSW) 176 Cited cited 17×
  3. In re Will of FB Gilbert (dec) [1946] NSWStRp 24 Cited cited 347×
  4. Australian Coal and Shale Employees' Federation v The Commonwealth [1953] HCA 25 Cited cited 89×
  5. Mace v Murray [1955] HCA 2 Cited cited 81×
  6. Adam P Brown Male Fashions Pty Ltd v Philip Morris Inc [1981] HCA 39 Cited cited 623×
  7. Giannarelli v Wraith [1988] HCA 52 Cited cited 162×
  8. State of Western Australia v Ward, Ben & Ors [1997] FCA 585 Cited cited 42×
  9. Paragon Finance plc v Noueri (Practice Note) [2001] 1 WLR 235 Cited cited 4×
  10. Harrington-Smith on behalf of the Wongatha People v State of Western Australia [2002] FCA 871 Cited cited 7×
  11. Teese v State Bank of New South Wales [2002] NSWCA 219 Cited cited 14×
  12. Damjanovic v Maley [2002] NSWCA 230 Cited cited 83×
  13. Vice-Chancellor, University of New South Wales v Curtin and McGuirk; Curtin v Vice-Chancellor, University of New South Wales (Interlocutory Applications) [2006] NSWADT 271 Cited cited 8×
  14. MAHENTHIRARASA v STATE RAIL AUTHORITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES (NO 2) [2008] NSWCA 201 Cited cited 80×
  15. Shirley v Director-General, Department of Education and Training [2009] NSWADT 140 Cited
  16. Shirley v Director-General, Department of Education and Training NSWADT (No. 2) [2009] NSWADT 235 Cited
  17. AY v Attorney General’s Department [2009] NSWADT 264 Cited
  18. AY v Department of Education and Training [2009] NSWADT 265 Cited
  19. Director-General, Dept of Ageing, Disability and Home Care v Lambert [2009] NSWCA 102 Cited cited 243×
  20. LN v Sydney South West Area Health Service (GD) [2010] NSWADTAP 16 Cited cited 5×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.