Pinpoint · Judgment search

SZOXJ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship

[2011] FCA 922

Federal Court of Australia · 3 August 2011 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Authorities cited (5)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. NAHI v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 10 Cited cited 358×
  2. NBKT v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCAFC 195 Cited cited 69×
  3. SZEQI v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCAFC 94 Cited
  4. Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS [2010] HCA 16 Cited cited 1,026×
  5. SZOXJ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] FMCA 355 Cited
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.