Pinpoint · Judgment search

Fair Work Ombudsman v W.K.O. Pty Ltd

[2012] FCA 1129

Federal Court of Australia · 17 October 2012 · Official judgment

Cited by 7 indexed judgments

All Cited 7

2013: 1 citing judgment 2015: 1 citing judgment 2016: 1 citing judgment 2017: 2 citing judgments 2018: 1 citing judgment 2021: 1 citing judgment 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union v Visy Packaging Pty Ltd (No 4) [2013] FCA 930 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  2. Sayed v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2015] FCA 338 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 10× · judgment
  3. Director of the Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate v O'Connor [2016] FCA 415 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 5× · judgment
  4. General Manager of the Fair Work Commission v McGiveron [2017] FCA 405 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  5. Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Australian Postal Corporation [2017] FCA 1091 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 5× · judgment
  6. Veeraragoo v Goldbreak Holdings Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCA 1448 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 5× · judgment
  7. Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v CoreStaff WA Pty Ltd (No 2) [2021] FCA 1149 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (25)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. R v Thompson (1975) 11 SASR 217 Cited cited 122×
  2. Yardley v Betts (1979) 22 SASR 108 Cited cited 66×
  3. Mill v The Queen [1988] HCA 70 Cited cited 841×
  4. Pearce v The Queen [1998] HCA 57 Cited cited 1,558×
  5. CPSU, The Community and Public Sector Union v Telstra Corporation Limited [2001] FCA 1364 Cited cited 50×
  6. Minister for Industry, Tourism & Resources v Mobil Oil Australia Pty Ltd [2004] FCAFC 72 Cited cited 168×
  7. Johnson v The Queen [2004] HCA 15 Cited cited 429×
  8. Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25 Cited cited 2,508×
  9. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Dataline.Net.Au Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 1427 Cited cited 138×
  10. Kelly v Fitzpatrick [2007] FCA 1080 Cited cited 108×
  11. Sharpe v Dogma Enterprises Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 1550 Cited cited 5×
  12. Ponzio v B & P Caelli Constructions Pty Ltd [2007] FCAFC 65 Cited cited 142×
  13. Mason v Harrington Corporation Pty Ltd [2007] FMCA 7 Applied or followed cited 24×
  14. Rojas v Esselte Australia Pty Limited (No 2) [2008] FCA 1585 Cited cited 21×
  15. Plancor Pty Ltd v Liquor Hospitality and Miscellaneous Union [2008] FCAFC 170 Cited cited 76×
  16. Mornington Inn Pty Ltd v Jordan [2008] FCAFC 70 Cited cited 129×
  17. Australian Ophthalmic Supplies Pty Ltd v McAlary-Smith [2008] FCAFC 8 Cited cited 205×
  18. Olsen v Sterling Crown Pty Ltd [2008] FMCA 1392 Cited
  19. Draffin v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2009] FCAFC 120 Cited cited 26×
  20. Lawlor v Personal Hire Pty Limited [2009] FMCA 228 Cited
  21. Fair Work Ombudsman v Australian Shooting Academy Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 1064 Cited cited 3×
  22. Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Professional Gyprock Solution Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 1393 Cited
  23. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Yellow Page Marketing BV (No 2) [2011] FCA 352 Cited cited 71×
  24. United Group Resources Pty Ltd v Calabro (No 7) [2012] FCA 432 Cited cited 10×
  25. Comcare v Transpacific Industries Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 90 Cited cited 9×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.