Federal Court of Australia · 18 May 2012 · Official judgment
No indexed judgment cites this case yet.
The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.
[1994] FCA 1253 Cited cited 448×[1999] FCA 289 Cited cited 5×[1994] FCA 1253 Applied or followed cited 448×(1995) 57 FCR 565 Cited cited 132×(1996) 62 FCR 402 Cited cited 88×(1998) 160 ALR 24 Cited cited 67×[1999] FCA 165 Applied or followed cited 43×[1989] HCA 62 Cited cited 873×[1994] FCA 1253 Applied or followed cited 448×[1997] HCA 22 Applied or followed cited 776×[1997] HCA 4 Applied or followed cited 414×[1999] FCA 182 Cited cited 43×[1981] FCA 197 Cited cited 34×[1989] FCA 116 Cited cited 31×(1996) 62 FCR 402 Cited cited 88×[1997] HCA 22 Applied or followed cited 776×[2000] FCA 91 Cited cited 6×[1989] HCA 62 Applied or followed cited 873×[1996] HCA 6 Applied or followed cited 2,712×[1989] HCA 62 Cited cited 873×[1990] HCA 33 Cited cited 2,077×[1990] HCA 21 Cited cited 736×[1993] FCA 456 Cited cited 845×[1997] HCA 22 Applied or followed cited 776×[1986] HCA 40 Cited cited 2,191×[1989] HCA 62 Cited cited 873×[1993] FCA 456 Cited cited 845×[1996] HCA 6 Cited cited 2,712×(1997) 142 ALR 331 Cited cited 83×(1998) 160 ALR 24 Applied or followed cited 67×[1999] FCA 247 Applied or followed cited 170×[1975] HCA 17 Cited cited 107×[1979] AATA 179 Cited cited 660×[1996] HCA 6 Cited cited 2,712×[1997] HCA 22 Cited cited 776×[2003] 3 All ER 449 Cited cited 2×[2010] HCA 41 Cited cited 299×[1985] HCA 81 Cited cited 1,205×[1986] HCA 40 Cited cited 2,191×[2000] HCA 57 Cited cited 962×[2003] HCA 2 Cited cited 1,335×[1936] HCA 40 Cited cited 4,342×[1990] HCA 33 Cited cited 2,077×[1995] HCA 58 Cited cited 1,391×[1998] HCA 28 Cited cited 2,785×[2003] HCA 26 Cited cited 943×[1999] HCA 21 Cited cited 971×[1999] HCA 14 Cited cited 844×[2000] HCA 57 Cited cited 962×[2003] HCA 2 Cited cited 1,335×[2003] HCA 6 Cited cited 918×[1985] HCA 81 Cited cited 1,205×[1986] HCA 54 Cited cited 682×[1990] HCA 21 Cited cited 736×[2000] HCA 57 Cited cited 962×[2011] FMCA 847 Cited cited 1×[2011] FMCA 878 Cited cited 1×Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.
[1994] FCA 1253
Cited cited 448× [1999] FCA 289
Cited cited 5× [2000] FCA 91
Cited cited 6× [2003] 3 All ER 449
Cited cited 2× [2010] HCA 41
Cited cited 299× [2011] FMCA 847
Cited [2011] FMCA 878
Cited Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.
Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.
Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.
Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.