Pinpoint · Judgment search

Cetinkaya v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy

[2012] FCA 611

Federal Court of Australia · 13 June 2012 · Official judgment

Cited by 3 indexed judgments

All Cited 3

2015: 1 citing judgment 2020: 1 citing judgment 2021: 1 citing judgment 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Unal v Cetinkaya [2015] FCA 270 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  2. Saravinovska v Saravinovski [2020] NSWSC 1232 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 5× · judgment
  3. Arafat v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 1432 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (9)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Re Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs; Ex parte Lai Qin [1997] HCA 6 Cited cited 1,033×
  2. Mineralogy Pty Ltd v National Native Title Tribunal & Ors [1998] FCA 1700 Cited cited 19×
  3. Ruddock v Vadarlis (No 2) [2001] 115 FCR 229 Cited cited 2×
  4. Christodoulou v Disney Enterprises Inc [2006] FCA 902 Cited cited 3×
  5. Akiba on Behalf of the Torres Strait Regional Sea Claim Group v State of Queensland [2010] FCA 321 Cited cited 8×
  6. Rickus v Motor Trades Association of Australia Superannuation Fund Pty Limited [2010] FCAFC 16 Cited cited 46×
  7. Ruddock v Vadarlis (No 2) (2011) 115 FCR 229 Cited
  8. Ann Street Mezzanine Pty Ltd v KPMG [2011] FCA 453 Cited cited 8×
  9. Cetinkaya v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2011] FMCA 288 Cited cited 2×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.