Pinpoint · Judgment search

CS v R

[2014] NSWCCA 229 ; (2014) 245 A Crim R 249

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 21 October 2014 · Official judgment

Cited by 2 indexed judgments

All Cited 2

2015: 1 citing judgment 2017: 1 citing judgment 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Cowling v R [2015] NSWCCA 213 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 35× · judgment
  2. IS v Regina [2017] NSWCCA 116 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 8× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (19)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Ibbs v R [1987] 163 CLR 447 Cited cited 4×
  2. Ibbs v The Queen [1987] HCA 46 Cited cited 219×
  3. R v AJP [2004] NSWCCA 434 Cited cited 224×
  4. R v KNL [2005] NSWCCA 260 Cited cited 41×
  5. FINA'I v REGINA [2006] NSWCCA 134 Cited cited 20×
  6. MLP v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 271 Cited cited 89×
  7. R v PGM [2008] NSWCCA 172 Cited cited 84×
  8. Phipps v R [2008] NSWCCA 178 Cited cited 8×
  9. Stoeski v R [2008] NSWCCA 230 Cited cited 12×
  10. SS v R; JC v R [2009] NSWCCA 114 Cited cited 17×
  11. R v Hibberd [2009] NSWCCA 20 Cited cited 51×
  12. HEJAZI v THE QUEEN [2009] NSWCCA 282 Cited cited 43×
  13. Maglis v R [2010] NSWCCA 247 Cited cited 31×
  14. Caristo v R [2011] NSWCCA 7 Cited cited 85×
  15. Collier v R [2012] NSWCCA 213 Cited cited 60×
  16. BT v R [2012] NSWCCA 276 Cited cited 5×
  17. Houri v R [2013] NSWCCA 279 Cited cited 11×
  18. CM v R [2013] NSWCCA 341 Cited cited 24×
  19. Achurch v The Queen [2014] HCA 10 Cited cited 55×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.