Pinpoint · Judgment search

Gifford v R

[2016] NSWCCA 302 ; (2016) 263 A Crim R 373

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 16 December 2016 · Official judgment

Cited by 9 indexed judgments

All Cited 9

2017: 1 citing judgment 2019: 2 citing judgments 2021: 1 citing judgment 2022: 2 citing judgments 2023: 3 citing judgments 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. R v JF [2017] NSWCCA 217 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 4× · judgment
  2. R v Scott Edward Roulston [2019] NSWDC 28 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  3. Clarke-Jeffries v R [2019] NSWCCA 56 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 45× · judgment
  4. R v Wood [2021] NSWDC 520 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  5. R v Khqustiaan [2022] NSWDC 128 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  6. R v LL [2022] NSWDC 208 Cited District Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  7. R v Harford [2023] NSWDC 6 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  8. R v Corbett [2023] NSWDC 248 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  9. R v Davis [2023] NSWDC 651 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (38)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. House v The King [1936] HCA 40 Cited cited 4,342×
  2. R v Chard (1971) 56 Cr App R 268 Cited
  3. R v Bonython (1984) 38 SASR 45 Cited cited 14×
  4. R v Hall (1988) 36 A Crim R 368 Cited cited 21×
  5. Veen v The Queen (No 2) [1988] HCA 14 Cited cited 1,716×
  6. R v Olbrich [1999] HCA 54 Cited cited 1,119×
  7. Dinsdale v The Queen [2000] HCA 54 Cited cited 929×
  8. R v THOMSON; R v HOULTON [2000] NSWCCA 309 Cited cited 2,216×
  9. R v Makoare [2001] 1 NZLR 318 Cited
  10. R v Qutami [2001] NSWCCA 353 Applied or followed cited 396×
  11. R v Palu [2002] NSWCCA 381 Applied or followed cited 157×
  12. Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25 Cited cited 2,508×
  13. AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES & INVESTMENTS COMMISSION v John David RICH & Ors [2005] NSWCA 152 Cited cited 66×
  14. MULATO v REGINA [2006] NSWCCA 282 Cited cited 404×
  15. R v Hays [2006] QCA 20 Cited cited 3×
  16. R (Cth) v Poynder [2007] NSWCCA 157 Cited cited 27×
  17. Western Australia v Collier [2007] WASCA 250 Cited cited 11×
  18. Hone v Western Australia [2007] WASCA 283 Doubted cited 9×
  19. Hammond v R [2008] NSWCCA 138 Cited cited 7×
  20. TECTOR v REGINA [2008] NSWCCA 151 Cited cited 23×
  21. R v Gajjar [2008] VSCA 268 Cited cited 26×
  22. R v Hizhnikov [2008] VSCA 269 Cited cited 6×
  23. R v Klamo [2008] VSCA 75 Cited cited 23×
  24. Hili v The Queen [2010] HCA 45 Cited cited 1,194×
  25. R v Fuller [2010] NSWCCA 192 Cited cited 22×
  26. Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194 Cited cited 1,099×
  27. O'NEIL-SHAW v THE QUEEN [2010] NSWCCA 42 Cited cited 37×
  28. R v Rodriguez [2010] NSWSC 198 Cited cited 20×
  29. REBERGER v R [2011] NSWCCA 132 Cited cited 9×
  30. R v PCB [2012] NSWSC 482 Cited cited 3×
  31. Adam Jolly v R [2013] NSWCCA 76 Cited cited 43×
  32. R v Fahda [2013] NSWCCA 86 Cited cited 17×
  33. Barbaro v The Queen [2014] HCA 2 Cited cited 358×
  34. R v Loveridge [2014] NSWCCA 120 Applied or followed cited 90×
  35. Goodridge v R [2014] NSWCCA 37 Cited cited 8×
  36. Queen v Pham [2015] HCA 39 Cited cited 225×
  37. Knight v R [2015] NSWCCA 222 Cited cited 19×
  38. Heath v Regina [2016] NSWCCA 24 Cited cited 3×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.