Pinpoint · Judgment search

Efthimiadis v R (No 2)

[2016] NSWCCA 9

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 9 February 2016 · Official judgment

Cited by 10 indexed judgments

All Cited 10

2016: 3 citing judgments 2017: 1 citing judgment 2019: 3 citing judgments 2020: 2 citing judgments 2021: 1 citing judgment 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Further application of Henry Edgar Des Rosiers pursuant to s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2016] NSWSC 365 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  2. R v Qaumi & Ors (No 33) [2016] NSWSC 676 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  3. R v Qaumi & Ors (No 67) [2016] NSWSC 1601 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  4. R v Droudis (No. 16) [2017] NSWSC 20 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 5× · judgment
  5. R v Phillip Michael SUMMERFIELD [2019] NSWDC 126 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  6. R v TL [2019] NSWDC 239 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  7. R v Casey [2019] NSWDC 751 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  8. R v Schnorrenberg [2020] NSWDC 497 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  9. Romeo v R [2020] NSWCCA 221 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · judgment
  10. TABER v R [2021] NSWDC 60 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (21)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Veen v The Queen (No 2) [1988] HCA 14 Cited cited 1,716×
  2. IN THE MATTER OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S APPLICATION (NO 1) UNDER s26 OF THE CRIMINAL APPEAL ACT; R v PONFIELD; R v SCOTT; R v RYAN; R v JOHNSON [1999] NSWCCA 435 Cited cited 222×
  3. REGINA v FERNANDO [2002] NSWCCA 28 Cited cited 62×
  4. R v Palu [2002] NSWCCA 381 Cited cited 157×
  5. Regina v Darrell Terry McNaughton [2006] NSWCCA 242 Cited cited 487×
  6. R v M.A.K., R v M.S.K. [2006] NSWCCA 381 Cited cited 369×
  7. Bou-Antoun v Regina [2008] NSWCCA 1 Cited cited 8×
  8. R v Burton [2008] NSWCCA 128 Cited cited 39×
  9. Louizos v R, R v Louizos [2009] NSWCCA 71 Cited cited 28×
  10. Hili v The Queen [2010] HCA 45 Cited cited 1,194×
  11. Ali v R [2010] NSWCCA 35 Cited cited 48×
  12. Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39 Cited cited 1,670×
  13. Abdul v R [2013] NSWCCA 247 Overruled or disapproved cited 46×
  14. Efthimiadis v R [2013] NSWCCA 276 Cited cited 6×
  15. Barbaro v The Queen [2014] HCA 2 Cited cited 358×
  16. Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37 Overruled or disapproved cited 712×
  17. MLP v R [2014] NSWCCA 183 Cited cited 57×
  18. Skocic v R [2014] NSWCCA 225 Cited cited 19×
  19. Louizos v R [2014] NSWCCA 242 Cited cited 12×
  20. Queen v Pham [2015] HCA 39 Cited cited 225×
  21. Lowe v R [2015] NSWCCA 46 Cited cited 7×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.