Pinpoint · Judgment search

CEU v University of Technology Sydney

[2017] NSWCATAD 79

NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · 13 March 2017 · Official judgment

Cited by 11 indexed judgments

All Cited 11

2017: 2 citing judgments 2018: 5 citing judgments 2019: 1 citing judgment 2021: 1 citing judgment 2022: 1 citing judgment 2025: 1 citing judgment 2017 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. CTH v The University of New South Wales [2017] NSWCATAD 244 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 3× · judgment
  2. CEU v University of Technology Sydney [2017] NSWCATAD 323 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 6× · judgment
  3. Jackson v The University of New South Wales [2018] NSWCATAD 12 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 7× · judgment
  4. CEU v University of Technology Sydney [2018] NSWCATAD 13 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 28× · judgment
  5. CEU v University of Technology Sydney [2018] NSWCATAD 53 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 4× · judgment
  6. CEU v University of Technology, Sydney [2018] NSWCATAD 185 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 5× · judgment
  7. Choi v NSW Ombudsman [2018] NSWCATAD 248 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 6× · judgment
  8. CEU v University of Technology Sydney; University of Technology Sydney v CEU [2019] NSWCATAD 11 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 3× · judgment
  9. EJE v Nepean Blue Mountains Local Area Health District [2021] NSWCATAD 289 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 4× · judgment
  10. EON v Mid North Coast Local Health District [2022] NSWCATAD 113 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 1× · judgment
  11. FVR and FWA v Department of Education [2025] NSWCATAD 50 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (4)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. NAKHL NASR v STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES; GEORGE NASR v STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES [2007] NSWCA 101 Cited cited 52×
  2. RL v Department of Education and Training [2009] NSWADT 257 Cited cited 4×
  3. AF v Minister for Health; Minister for Health v AF [2012] NSWADTAP 16 Cited cited 14×
  4. AF v Minister for Health [2012] NSWADTAP 61 Cited cited 6×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.