Pinpoint · Judgment search

CT v R

[2017] NSWCCA 15

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 24 February 2017 · Official judgment

Cited by 9 indexed judgments

All Cited 9

2017: 5 citing judgments 2018: 2 citing judgments 2019: 1 citing judgment 2020: 1 citing judgment 2017 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. R v Mollel [2017] NSWDC 36 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  2. R v AJB [2017] NSWDC 81 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  3. JM v R;; R v JM [2017] NSWCCA 138 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 4× · judgment
  4. Faehringer v R [2017] NSWCCA 248 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 17× · judgment
  5. R v Hall [2017] NSWCCA 313 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 13× · judgment
  6. Katsis v R [2018] NSWCCA 9 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 13× · judgment
  7. R v Toma [2018] NSWCCA 45 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 2× · judgment
  8. R v Toohey [2019] NSWCCA 182 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 8× · judgment
  9. R v Hickson (No 4) [2020] NSWSC 340 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 5× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (27)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. House v The King [1936] HCA 40 Cited cited 4,342×
  2. Power v The Queen [1974] HCA 26 Cited cited 283×
  3. Lowndes v The Queen [1999] HCA 29 Cited cited 405×
  4. REGINA v LOPEZ [1999] NSWCCA 245 Cited cited 7×
  5. Dinsdale v The Queen [2000] HCA 54 Cited cited 929×
  6. Regina v Bacon [2000] NSWCCA 549 Cited cited 14×
  7. Ryan v The Queen [2001] HCA 21 Cited cited 307×
  8. Wong v The Queen [2001] HCA 64 Cited cited 1,044×
  9. Regina v MJR [2002] NSWCCA 129 Cited cited 173×
  10. Regina v Anthony Kendall Hutton [2004] NSWCCA 60 Cited cited 7×
  11. Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25 Cited cited 2,508×
  12. Vuni v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 171 Cited cited 59×
  13. Shannon v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 39 Cited cited 17×
  14. Cahyadi v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 1 Applied or followed cited 601×
  15. R v Burns [2007] NSWCCA 228 Cited cited 22×
  16. A.J.B. v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 51 Cited cited 68×
  17. Hili v The Queen [2010] HCA 45 Cited cited 1,194×
  18. Daniel Clayton Scott v R [2011] NSWCCA 221 Cited cited 5×
  19. PWB v R [2011] NSWCCA 84 Cited cited 42×
  20. R v Brown [2012] NSWCCA 199 Cited cited 70×
  21. Franklin v R [2013] NSWCCA 122 Applied or followed cited 23×
  22. MPB v R [2013] NSWCCA 213 Cited cited 39×
  23. Magnuson v R [2013] NSWCCA 50 Cited cited 61×
  24. R v BA [2014] NSWCCA 148 Cited cited 24×
  25. JM v R [2014] NSWCCA 297 Cited cited 295×
  26. R v Nelson [2016] NSWCCA 130 Cited cited 53×
  27. Kerr v R [2016] NSWCCA 218 Cited cited 72×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.