Pinpoint · Judgment search

Gibbons (a pseudonym) v R

[2019] NSWCCA 150

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 12 July 2019 · Official judgment

Cited by 9 indexed judgments

All Cited 9

2019: 2 citing judgments 2022: 5 citing judgments 2023: 1 citing judgment 2024: 1 citing judgment 2019 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Facer (a pseudonym) v R [2019] NSWCCA 180 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 4× · judgment
  2. Lissock v R [2019] NSWCCA 282 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · judgment
  3. R v Alfred (a pseudonym) [2022] NSWDC 494 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  4. Application by Shelden Patrick Vaughan pursuant to s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) [2022] NSWSC 920 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  5. Davidson v R [2022] NSWCCA 153 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 18× · judgment
  6. SB v R [2022] NSWCCA 164 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 9× · judgment
  7. DH v R [2022] NSWCCA 200 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 49× · judgment
  8. Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v TH [2023] NSWCCA 81 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 19× · judgment
  9. Nicholas v R [2024] NSWCCA 144 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (19)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Veen v The Queen (No 2) [1988] HCA 14 Cited cited 1,716×
  2. Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25 Cited cited 2,508×
  3. MULATO v REGINA [2006] NSWCCA 282 Cited cited 404×
  4. R v M.A.K., R v M.S.K. [2006] NSWCCA 381 Cited cited 369×
  5. Saddler v R [2009] NSWCCA 83 Cited cited 49×
  6. MRW v R [2011] NSWCCA 260 Cited cited 65×
  7. Hart v R [2013] NSWCCA 13 Cited cited 2×
  8. Leslie v R [2013] NSWCCA 48 Cited cited 7×
  9. Mammone v R [2013] NSWCCA 95 Cited cited 31×
  10. BR v R [2015] NSWCCA 255 Cited cited 10×
  11. Bravo v R [2015] NSWCCA 302 Cited cited 41×
  12. MD v R [2015] NSWCCA 37 Cited cited 34×
  13. The Queen v Kilic [2016] HCA 48 Overruled or disapproved cited 168×
  14. R v Scavera [2016] NSWCCA 145 Cited cited 7×
  15. Franklin v R [2016] NSWCCA 319 Cited cited 16×
  16. ZA v R [2017] NSWCCA 132 Distinguished cited 40×
  17. R v CTG [2017] NSWCCA 163 Cited cited 27×
  18. Faehringer v R [2017] NSWCCA 248 Cited cited 17×
  19. Mills v R [2017] NSWCCA 87 Cited cited 41×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.