Pinpoint · Judgment search

R v Keith Owen Goodbun

[2018] NSWSC 1025

Supreme Court of NSW · 4 July 2018 · Official judgment

Cited by 3 indexed judgments

All Cited 3

2019: 1 citing judgment 2020: 1 citing judgment 2022: 1 citing judgment 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. R v Edwards (No 3) [2019] NSWSC 1815 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 6× · judgment
  2. Goodbun v R [2020] NSWCCA 77 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 22× · judgment
  3. R v Lloyd [2022] NSWSC 906 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 5× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (40)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Veen v The Queen (No 2) [1988] HCA 14 Cited cited 1,716×
  2. Chow v Director of Public Prosecutions (1992) 28 NSWLR 593 Cited cited 98×
  3. R v Holyoak (1995) 82 A Crim R 502 Cited cited 70×
  4. R v Engert (1995) 84 A Crim R 67 Cited cited 454×
  5. R v Stafrace (1997) 96 A Crim R 452 Cited cited 11×
  6. Regina v Leslie Kalache [2000] NSWCCA 2 Cited cited 108×
  7. R v THOMSON; R v HOULTON [2000] NSWCCA 309 Cited cited 2,216×
  8. R v Qutami [2001] NSWCCA 353 Applied or followed cited 396×
  9. R v McLean [2001] NSWCCA 58 Cited cited 35×
  10. Regina v Miles [2002] NSWCCA 276 Cited cited 29×
  11. R v McGourty [2002] NSWCCA 335 Applied or followed cited 73×
  12. R v Palu [2002] NSWCCA 381 Applied or followed cited 157×
  13. Regina v Elfar [2003] NSWCCA 358 Cited cited 61×
  14. GAS v The Queen [2004] HCA 22 Cited cited 133×
  15. Regina v Fidow [2004] NSWCCA 172 Cited cited 214×
  16. R v Merritt [2004] NSWCCA 19 Cited cited 98×
  17. R v Hamid [2006] NSWCCA 302 Cited cited 101×
  18. R v Thomas [2007] NSWCCA 269 Cited cited 61×
  19. BARTON v REGINA [2009] NSWCCA 164 Cited cited 27×
  20. Saddler v R [2009] NSWCCA 83 Cited cited 49×
  21. Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194 Cited cited 1,099×
  22. Pham v R [2010] NSWCCA 208 Cited cited 22×
  23. Pfitzner v R [2010] NSWCCA 314 Cited cited 45×
  24. O'NEIL-SHAW v THE QUEEN [2010] NSWCCA 42 Cited cited 37×
  25. SJ v Regina [2011] NSWCCA 160 Cited cited 3×
  26. Alvares v R Farache v R [2011] NSWCCA 33 Cited cited 47×
  27. Munda v Western Australia [2013] HCA 38 Cited cited 287×
  28. Mammone v R [2013] NSWCCA 95 Applied or followed cited 31×
  29. Aslan v R [2014] NSWCCA 114 Cited cited 114×
  30. Filippou v The Queen [2015] HCA 29 Cited cited 283×
  31. Browning v R [2015] NSWCCA 147 Cited cited 20×
  32. Bravo v R [2015] NSWCCA 302 Applied or followed cited 41×
  33. Pleasance v R [2016] NSWCCA 113 Cited cited 8×
  34. R v Turnbull (No. 26) [2016] NSWSC 847 Cited cited 8×
  35. Hurst v R [2017] NSWCCA 114 Applied or followed cited 14×
  36. Cherry v R [2017] NSWCCA 150 Cited cited 56×
  37. R v CTG [2017] NSWCCA 163 Applied or followed cited 27×
  38. Director of Public Prosecutions v Darcy-Shillingsworth [2017] NSWCCA 224 Cited cited 14×
  39. Faehringer v R [2017] NSWCCA 248 Cited cited 17×
  40. Mills v R [2017] NSWCCA 87 Applied or followed cited 41×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.